Negative sampling strategies impact the prediction of scale-free biomolecular network interactions with machine learning

Our findings present a novel perspective for assessing the performance of ML models in inferring protein-molecular interactions with greater fairness. By addressing biases introduced by network properties, the DDB sampling approach provides a more balanced and precise assessment of model capabilities. These insights hold the potential to bolster the reliability of ML models in bioinformatics, fostering a more stringent evaluation framework for predicting protein-molecular interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Biology
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02231-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative sampling strategies impact the prediction of scale-free biomolecular network interactions with machine learning

Bowen Shao, Guoqing Zhao, Pengpai Li, Zhi‐Ping Liu
3 citations
BMC Biology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
4.51
article

Negative sampling strategies impact the prediction of scale-free biomolecular network interactions with machine learning

Bowen Shao, Guoqing Zhao, Pengpai Li, Zhi‐Ping Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our findings present a novel perspective for assessing the performance of ML models in inferring protein-molecular interactions with greater fairness. By addressing biases introduced by network properties, the DDB sampling approach provides a more balanced and precise assessment of model capabilities. These insights hold the potential to bolster the reliability of ML models in bioinformatics, fostering a more stringent evaluation framework for predicting protein-molecular interactions.

BMC BiologyVol. 23(1)
Shandong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.