Ways out of the Void? Postcolonial and Decolonial Theories in Relation to Armenia and Armenianness

The application of postcolonial theory to former Soviet socialist republics is much debated. For Tlostanova (2012) , Western theorizations of colonialism consign former Soviet socialist republics, including Armenia, to an undifferentiated void, not fully part of the Global North or South. Spivak's (2008) discussion of the Armenian case highlights the inability of conceptualizations of colonialism focused on the nation-state to account for the imperial forces at work in the Caucasus. She argues instead for the potential of a non-ethnic, critical regionalism underlining local and highly specific histories. Tlostanova (2012) and others meanwhile have called for the development of more decolonial approaches drawing on Southern epistemologies and broader, intersectional explorations of national identity in relation to the Caucasus and other regions of the former Soviet East. In this article, we contribute to these debates by reassessing how well postcolonial analyses can illuminate complex global power relations and identity formations in the Republic of Armenia. Furthermore, we explore the relevance of these theories to different groups resident there. The first section focuses on postcolonial theory and explores different periods of Armenian history and their legacies in terms of colonialism. The second section explores the (little) everyday salience of these theories to residents of a country dominated since independence by war with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), drawing on a research project on migration to and from Armenia carried out in the early 2020s and led by the first author. The third section discusses potential theoretical ways forward and uses for theories of post and decoloniality in such complex and unstable circumstances. The experience and multiple viewpoints of Armenia's diverse internal diasporan communities—particularly those in Armenia since the Syrian, Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), and Ukraine wars—are threaded throughout.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diaspora A Journal of Transnational Studies
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/diaspora.24.2.2025.01.22
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ways out of the Void? Postcolonial and Decolonial Theories in Relation to Armenia and Armenianness

Nona Shahnazarian, P. S. Baker, Sarah Wilson, Aram Vartikyan
Diaspora A Journal of Transnational Studies
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

Ways out of the Void? Postcolonial and Decolonial Theories in Relation to Armenia and Armenianness

Nona Shahnazarian, P. S. Baker, Sarah Wilson, Aram Vartikyan
article en

Abstract

The application of postcolonial theory to former Soviet socialist republics is much debated. For Tlostanova (2012) , Western theorizations of colonialism consign former Soviet socialist republics, including Armenia, to an undifferentiated void, not fully part of the Global North or South. Spivak's (2008) discussion of the Armenian case highlights the inability of conceptualizations of colonialism focused on the nation-state to account for the imperial forces at work in the Caucasus. She argues instead for the potential of a non-ethnic, critical regionalism underlining local and highly specific histories. Tlostanova (2012) and others meanwhile have called for the development of more decolonial approaches drawing on Southern epistemologies and broader, intersectional explorations of national identity in relation to the Caucasus and other regions of the former Soviet East. In this article, we contribute to these debates by reassessing how well postcolonial analyses can illuminate complex global power relations and identity formations in the Republic of Armenia. Furthermore, we explore the relevance of these theories to different groups resident there. The first section focuses on postcolonial theory and explores different periods of Armenian history and their legacies in terms of colonialism. The second section explores the (little) everyday salience of these theories to residents of a country dominated since independence by war with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), drawing on a research project on migration to and from Armenia carried out in the early 2020s and led by the first author. The third section discusses potential theoretical ways forward and uses for theories of post and decoloniality in such complex and unstable circumstances. The experience and multiple viewpoints of Armenia's diverse internal diasporan communities—particularly those in Armenia since the Syrian, Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), and Ukraine wars—are threaded throughout.

Diaspora A Journal of Transnational StudiesVol. 24(2)
University of Stirling (GB), Yerevan State University (AM), National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.