Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone

Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone

Annet M. Bosch, Rose Maase, Francjan J. van Spronsen, Allysa M. Dijkstra et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
1.32
article

Evaluation of the Performance of Newborn Screening for Tyrosinemia Type 1 in The Netherlands: Suggestions for Improvements Using Additional Biomarkers in Addition to Succinylacetone

Annet M. Bosch, Rose Maase, Francjan J. van Spronsen, Allysa M. Dijkstra, Evelien A. Kemper, Anita Boelen, Marelle J. Bouva, Sandra G. Heil, Margaretha Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, Annemieke C. Heijboer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Currently, Dutch newborns are screened for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) using succinylacetone (SA) as the biomarker. Although the sensitivity of the test is high, a high number of false positives is observed. Here, the aim is to evaluate the current Dutch newborn-screening protocol and to assess alternatives, specifically the use of biomarkers that are already being measured, to increase the positive predictive value (PPV). TT1 screening was performed with the Revvity NeoBase assay between 2008 and 2017, and since 2018, the Revvity NeoBase 2 assay has been used. Data from 2018 to 2021 were used for evaluation. To simulate alternative screening protocols, these data were enriched with results of referrals from other periods and a false negative (FN) from 2010. In 2018-2021, 693,821 newborns were screened, resulting in 23 referrals, of whom two were TT1 patients. For this period, to date, no FN have been reported, resulting in a provisional sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 99.997%, and a PPV and negative predictive value of 9% and 100%, respectively. To improve the PPV, we combined SA, tyrosine (tyr), tyr × SA and tyr/phenylalanine and achieved a PPV of 72% for this dataset without introducing FN in the original dataset. This illustrates that future screening for TT1 may benefit from the addition of these biomarkers.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 11(2)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), IJsselland Ziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.