Widespread false negatives in DNA-encoded library data: how linker effects impair machine learning-based lead prediction

DNA-encoded chemical libraries (DECLs) have become integral to early-stage drug discovery, yielding active compounds and extensive labeled datasets for machine learning (ML)-based prediction of bioactive molecules. However, the information content of DECL selection data remains scarcely explored. This study systematically investigates for the first time the prevalence of false negatives and the influence of the linker in DECL data. Using a focused DECL targeting the poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerases PARP1/2 and TNKS1/2 as a model system, we found that our DECL selections frequently miss active compounds, with numerous false negatives for each identified hit. The presence of the DNA-conjugation linker emerged as a factor contributing to the underdetection of active molecules. This bias toward false negatives compromises the predictive power of DECL data for prioritizing hits, anticipating target selectivity, and training ML models, as determined by analyzing the effects of undersampling and oversampling techniques in learning the PARP2 data. Conversely, the linker's presence in DECLs offers advantages, such as enabling the identification of target-selective protein engagers, even when the underlying molecules themselves may not be selective. These findings highlight the challenges and opportunities of DECL data, emphasizing the need for best practices in data handling and ML model development in drug discovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc00844a
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Widespread false negatives in DNA-encoded library data: how linker effects impair machine learning-based lead prediction

Scott Tingey, Adam S. Hogendorf, Raphael M. Franzini, Lik Hang Yuen et al.
6 citations
Chemical Science
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
9.03
article

Widespread false negatives in DNA-encoded library data: how linker effects impair machine learning-based lead prediction

Scott Tingey, Adam S. Hogendorf, Raphael M. Franzini, Lik Hang Yuen, H. Schüler, Alba L. Montoya, Aadarsh Kuberan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

DNA-encoded chemical libraries (DECLs) have become integral to early-stage drug discovery, yielding active compounds and extensive labeled datasets for machine learning (ML)-based prediction of bioactive molecules. However, the information content of DECL selection data remains scarcely explored. This study systematically investigates for the first time the prevalence of false negatives and the influence of the linker in DECL data. Using a focused DECL targeting the poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerases PARP1/2 and TNKS1/2 as a model system, we found that our DECL selections frequently miss active compounds, with numerous false negatives for each identified hit. The presence of the DNA-conjugation linker emerged as a factor contributing to the underdetection of active molecules. This bias toward false negatives compromises the predictive power of DECL data for prioritizing hits, anticipating target selectivity, and training ML models, as determined by analyzing the effects of undersampling and oversampling techniques in learning the PARP2 data. Conversely, the linker's presence in DECLs offers advantages, such as enabling the identification of target-selective protein engagers, even when the underlying molecules themselves may not be selective. These findings highlight the challenges and opportunities of DECL data, emphasizing the need for best practices in data handling and ML model development in drug discovery.

Chemical ScienceVol. 16(24)
Lund University (SE), University of Utah (US), Waterford Institute (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
National Science Foundation, Vetenskapsrådet, National Institutes of Health, Division of Chemistry
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
9.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.