Environmental Conditions and Forecast Error Evolution Associated with Synoptic Progressiveness Errors in GFS Forecasts

Abstract Operational forecasters often note that medium-range forecasts of midtropospheric cutoff lows using the Global Forecast System (GFS) are typically characterized by excessive synoptic progressiveness, i.e., a tendency to advance features too quickly downstream. Recent research examining the displacement error characteristics of cutoff lows in 0–10-day GFS forecasts objectively corroborates anecdotal impressions of a progressive bias. To better understand the processes associated with progressiveness errors in the GFS, this research examines composite 500-hPa environments and forecast error evolutions that favor erroneously progressive cutoff lows. Time-lagged, feature-relative composite analyses of erroneously progressive cutoff lows indicate that these displacement errors are preceded by the onset of negative 500-hPa geopotential height errors in the environment surrounding the composite feature, most notably through an underamplification of an upstream ridge and heights that are too low poleward of the forecast feature. Concurrently, midtropospheric winds and cyclonic vorticity advection are too strong on the downstream and equatorward side of the forecast feature, consistent with greater forcing for height falls and faster downstream progression than verifying analyses. Furthermore, a systematic negative 500-hPa height bias during GFSv15 coincides with a worsening of this progressive bias over North America, while a systematic positive 500-hPa height bias during GFSv16 coincides with a reduction of synoptic progressiveness over North America. While GFSv16 partially remedies the progressive bias over North America, it is unclear if the underlying processes reducing these progressiveness errors have been resolved or if they are masked by the positive height bias in this model version. Significance Statement Recent research has corroborated operational impressions of a fast bias in GFS forecasts of midtropospheric cutoff lows, particularly during the fall, winter, and spring, which may limit forecast skill in potentially hazardous scenarios. Following from previous research, this study identifies processes by which this displacement error may occur in GFS forecasts. Forecast cutoff lows exhibiting a fast bias are characterized by negative geopotential height errors and wind speeds that are too fast in the environment surrounding the feature, creating a forecast environment that is conducive to faster downstream progression than in the true atmosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-24-0137.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Conditions and Forecast Error Evolution Associated with Synoptic Progressiveness Errors in GFS Forecasts

Craig S. Schwartz, Kevin M. Lupo
1 citations
Weather and Forecasting
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
3.09
article

Environmental Conditions and Forecast Error Evolution Associated with Synoptic Progressiveness Errors in GFS Forecasts

Craig S. Schwartz, Kevin M. Lupo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Operational forecasters often note that medium-range forecasts of midtropospheric cutoff lows using the Global Forecast System (GFS) are typically characterized by excessive synoptic progressiveness, i.e., a tendency to advance features too quickly downstream. Recent research examining the displacement error characteristics of cutoff lows in 0–10-day GFS forecasts objectively corroborates anecdotal impressions of a progressive bias. To better understand the processes associated with progressiveness errors in the GFS, this research examines composite 500-hPa environments and forecast error evolutions that favor erroneously progressive cutoff lows. Time-lagged, feature-relative composite analyses of erroneously progressive cutoff lows indicate that these displacement errors are preceded by the onset of negative 500-hPa geopotential height errors in the environment surrounding the composite feature, most notably through an underamplification of an upstream ridge and heights that are too low poleward of the forecast feature. Concurrently, midtropospheric winds and cyclonic vorticity advection are too strong on the downstream and equatorward side of the forecast feature, consistent with greater forcing for height falls and faster downstream progression than verifying analyses. Furthermore, a systematic negative 500-hPa height bias during GFSv15 coincides with a worsening of this progressive bias over North America, while a systematic positive 500-hPa height bias during GFSv16 coincides with a reduction of synoptic progressiveness over North America. While GFSv16 partially remedies the progressive bias over North America, it is unclear if the underlying processes reducing these progressiveness errors have been resolved or if they are masked by the positive height bias in this model version. Significance Statement Recent research has corroborated operational impressions of a fast bias in GFS forecasts of midtropospheric cutoff lows, particularly during the fall, winter, and spring, which may limit forecast skill in potentially hazardous scenarios. Following from previous research, this study identifies processes by which this displacement error may occur in GFS forecasts. Forecast cutoff lows exhibiting a fast bias are characterized by negative geopotential height errors and wind speeds that are too fast in the environment surrounding the feature, creating a forecast environment that is conducive to faster downstream progression than in the true atmosphere.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 40(7)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.