Forest restoration in tropical forests recovers topsoil water retention but does not improve deep soil layers

Tropical primary forests have been rapidly reduced in recent decade owing to slash-and-burn, leading to the formation of tropical secondary forests in different recovery stages. However, it is still unclear whether the soil water retention capacity in secondary forests can recover to the level of soil water retention in old-growth forest. In this study, three recovery stages of tropical secondary forests (i.e. early recovery stage, middle recovery stage, late recovery stage), and old-growth forest were selected for comparison in tropical forests on Hainan Island. By using spatiotemporal substitution method, we investigated the variation of soil water retention in three recovery stages and old-growth forest, and revealed its dominant controlling factors. The results showed that 0-60 cm soil water retention was improved as recovery stage progresses. Specifically, the topsoil (0-10 cm) soil water retention in later stage almost could recover the level of old-growth forest, whereas the deep soil (10-60 cm) water retention may not recover the level of old-growth forest as recovery stage progresses. Additionally, the soil structure and soil nutrients also improve while the soil aggregates stability reduced as recovery stage progresses. Among these properties, total porosity was found to be the most important factor controlling soil water retention, accounting for 27.44%, followed by bulk density (19.62%) and capillary porosity (16.83%), but soil particle size composition had a weakly effect on soil water retention. Overall, our results suggested that forest restoration is effective measures improve topsoil water retention capacity, but the deep soil water retention capacity may need more years to recovery. These findings have implications for the management and retention of primary forests and the restoration of secondary forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.05.002
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest restoration in tropical forests recovers topsoil water retention but does not improve deep soil layers

Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, Shuting Yu, Siyuan Cheng et al.
5 citations
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Soil erosion and sediment transport
5.93
article

Forest restoration in tropical forests recovers topsoil water retention but does not improve deep soil layers

Zhongyi Sun, Zhongmin Hu, Shuting Yu, Siyuan Cheng, Licong Dai, Qiaoyan Chen, Xiaowei Guo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Tropical primary forests have been rapidly reduced in recent decade owing to slash-and-burn, leading to the formation of tropical secondary forests in different recovery stages. However, it is still unclear whether the soil water retention capacity in secondary forests can recover to the level of soil water retention in old-growth forest. In this study, three recovery stages of tropical secondary forests (i.e. early recovery stage, middle recovery stage, late recovery stage), and old-growth forest were selected for comparison in tropical forests on Hainan Island. By using spatiotemporal substitution method, we investigated the variation of soil water retention in three recovery stages and old-growth forest, and revealed its dominant controlling factors. The results showed that 0-60 cm soil water retention was improved as recovery stage progresses. Specifically, the topsoil (0-10 cm) soil water retention in later stage almost could recover the level of old-growth forest, whereas the deep soil (10-60 cm) water retention may not recover the level of old-growth forest as recovery stage progresses. Additionally, the soil structure and soil nutrients also improve while the soil aggregates stability reduced as recovery stage progresses. Among these properties, total porosity was found to be the most important factor controlling soil water retention, accounting for 27.44%, followed by bulk density (19.62%) and capillary porosity (16.83%), but soil particle size composition had a weakly effect on soil water retention. Overall, our results suggested that forest restoration is effective measures improve topsoil water retention capacity, but the deep soil water retention capacity may need more years to recovery. These findings have implications for the management and retention of primary forests and the restoration of secondary forests.

International Soil and Water Conservation ResearchVol. 13(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hainan University (CN), Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
5.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.