Examining barriers and facilitators of dental fear treatment adoption: A qualitative study of practicing dentists

Over fifteen percent of the global population experiences dental fear, and although evidence-based treatments exist, adoption of these treatments is almost non-existent. Informed by our prior research examining barriers to adopting face-to-face behavioral treatments in dental operatories, this study examined dentists' responses to three stepped-care Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Dental Fear (CBT-DF) formats that use technology. All approaches offer an automated component as the first step (a mobile app) and either an in-person, virtual reality (VR), or video telehealth session as the second step. This study aims to understand which of these approaches would most likely be adopted by private practice dentists and why. Eight focus groups/solo interviews with a total of 13 private practice dentists were conducted with the aim to assess barriers and facilitators to implementing three stepped-care approaches of CBT-DF. The qualitative data obtained from these interviews was coded and analyzed according to Rogers' framework of innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability). The results indicated that participants acknowledged the value of interventions to address dental fear, as they had personal experiences with fearful patients that impacted their practices. Participants responded positively to the automated component of treatment (the app) and were more wary of treatment options requiring office space and staff time (in-person VR and in-person mental health provider). The telehealth option received the most favorable response, although some doubts were expressed regarding relative efficacy and patient accountability. Thus, dissemination of an app-telehealth treatment model that allows dentists to serve as referral partners is promising, given dentists' incentives to decrease patient fear while avoiding opportunity cost (e.g., occupied chairs and staff time).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322884
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining barriers and facilitators of dental fear treatment adoption: A qualitative study of practicing dentists

Amy M. Smith Slep, Kelly A. Daly, Richard E. Heyman, Mark S. Wolff et al.
2 citations
PLoS ONE
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
3.58
article

Examining barriers and facilitators of dental fear treatment adoption: A qualitative study of practicing dentists

Amy M. Smith Slep, Kelly A. Daly, Richard E. Heyman, Mark S. Wolff, Jennie Ochshorn, ViniNatalie Zaninovic
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Over fifteen percent of the global population experiences dental fear, and although evidence-based treatments exist, adoption of these treatments is almost non-existent. Informed by our prior research examining barriers to adopting face-to-face behavioral treatments in dental operatories, this study examined dentists' responses to three stepped-care Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Dental Fear (CBT-DF) formats that use technology. All approaches offer an automated component as the first step (a mobile app) and either an in-person, virtual reality (VR), or video telehealth session as the second step. This study aims to understand which of these approaches would most likely be adopted by private practice dentists and why. Eight focus groups/solo interviews with a total of 13 private practice dentists were conducted with the aim to assess barriers and facilitators to implementing three stepped-care approaches of CBT-DF. The qualitative data obtained from these interviews was coded and analyzed according to Rogers' framework of innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability). The results indicated that participants acknowledged the value of interventions to address dental fear, as they had personal experiences with fearful patients that impacted their practices. Participants responded positively to the automated component of treatment (the app) and were more wary of treatment options requiring office space and staff time (in-person VR and in-person mental health provider). The telehealth option received the most favorable response, although some doubts were expressed regarding relative efficacy and patient accountability. Thus, dissemination of an app-telehealth treatment model that allows dentists to serve as referral partners is promising, given dentists' incentives to decrease patient fear while avoiding opportunity cost (e.g., occupied chairs and staff time).

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
New York University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.