Comparison of Widely-used Image Restoration Methods for Additive and Multiplicative Noises

This paper evaluates and compares the performance of various image denoising techniques, including wavelet transform, Wiener filtering, non-local means (NLM), denoising autoencoders (DAEs), and feedforward autoencoders. There are cases of additive and multiplicative noises considered where the Gaussian distribution with zero mean stands for the first case and an exponential distribution with unity mean describes the second case (speckle). The experiments have been conducted on the given dataset which contained both still test images and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images with varying noise levels to analyze the effectiveness of these denoising approaches. The performance of each method is assessed using key image quality metrics: Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Normalized Absolute Error (NAK). The results demonstrate that denoising autoencoders DAEs provide superior performance in terms of structural preservation and noise reduction, particularly in low-noise conditions, while Wiener filtering proves to be computationally efficient and robust under high-noise conditions. These findings offer insights into the selection of effective denoising techniques for noisy images based on specific noise characteristics and application requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dspa64310.2025.10977909
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Widely-used Image Restoration Methods for Additive and Multiplicative Noises

Yury S. Bekhtin, Mohammad J. M. Zedan
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Comparison of Widely-used Image Restoration Methods for Additive and Multiplicative Noises

Yury S. Bekhtin, Mohammad J. M. Zedan
article en

Abstract

This paper evaluates and compares the performance of various image denoising techniques, including wavelet transform, Wiener filtering, non-local means (NLM), denoising autoencoders (DAEs), and feedforward autoencoders. There are cases of additive and multiplicative noises considered where the Gaussian distribution with zero mean stands for the first case and an exponential distribution with unity mean describes the second case (speckle). The experiments have been conducted on the given dataset which contained both still test images and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images with varying noise levels to analyze the effectiveness of these denoising approaches. The performance of each method is assessed using key image quality metrics: Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Normalized Absolute Error (NAK). The results demonstrate that denoising autoencoders DAEs provide superior performance in terms of structural preservation and noise reduction, particularly in low-noise conditions, while Wiener filtering proves to be computationally efficient and robust under high-noise conditions. These findings offer insights into the selection of effective denoising techniques for noisy images based on specific noise characteristics and application requirements.

Moscow Power Engineering Institute (RU), Ryazan State Radio Engineering University (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.