Comparisons of Verification-based Decodings for Nonbinary Codes in Error and Error-Erasure Channels

Recently, new algorithms on verification-based decoding for codes with nonbinary symbols have been proposed. Namely, there are 1) Vector Symbol Decoding (VSD) that corrects only the data part, 2) hard-decision Message Passing (hMP) that uses a group common idea and 3) limited complexity VSD for partial retransmission ARQ. This paper compares them in terms of their decoding time and decoding performance in various error channels and an error-erasure channel. Symbol error rates (SER) for these channels are necessary and are reported for the 32-bit symbol case. Results show that while VSD: correct data only has the best performance in all channels, hMP group common has the least decoding time and better performance than limited complexity VSD in error channels. The idea of converting erasures to errors is investigated in comparison with the previous idea of converting errors to erasures. Results show that VSD: correct data only is still the best for any overhead. Other methods give good performance for different ranges of overhead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ieecon64081.2025.10987681
Primary Topic
Radiation Effects in Electronics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons of Verification-based Decodings for Nonbinary Codes in Error and Error-Erasure Channels

Usana Tuntoolavest, Visuttha Manthamkarn, Yosita Tinjunchay, Peerawat Changchaisri et al.
Radiation Effects in Electronics
article

Comparisons of Verification-based Decodings for Nonbinary Codes in Error and Error-Erasure Channels

Usana Tuntoolavest, Visuttha Manthamkarn, Yosita Tinjunchay, Peerawat Changchaisri, Reungarun Sukitphimolpunt
article en

Abstract

Recently, new algorithms on verification-based decoding for codes with nonbinary symbols have been proposed. Namely, there are 1) Vector Symbol Decoding (VSD) that corrects only the data part, 2) hard-decision Message Passing (hMP) that uses a group common idea and 3) limited complexity VSD for partial retransmission ARQ. This paper compares them in terms of their decoding time and decoding performance in various error channels and an error-erasure channel. Symbol error rates (SER) for these channels are necessary and are reported for the 32-bit symbol case. Results show that while VSD: correct data only has the best performance in all channels, hMP group common has the least decoding time and better performance than limited complexity VSD in error channels. The idea of converting erasures to errors is investigated in comparison with the previous idea of converting errors to erasures. Results show that VSD: correct data only is still the best for any overhead. Other methods give good performance for different ranges of overhead.

Kasetsart University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Radiation Effects in Electronics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.