Performance Evaluation of Tunnel and Indirect-Type Solar Dryers: A Study Using Potato Slices

This study presents the comparative performance of a solar tunnel dryer and an indirect-type solar dryer for drying potato slices. Experiments are conducted to assess moisture removal efficiency, drying time, and energy efficiency. The initial moisture content of potato slices of 82% wet was reduced to 34.9% for solar tunnel dryer and 45.2% for indirect-type solar dryer. Both systems' drying times and temperature profiles are recorded. Results shows that the solar tunnel dryer achieves faster drying compares to indirect-type solar dryer, due to its higher and consistent temperatures. Energy efficiency calculations reveals that the solar tunnel dryer utilizes available solar energy more effectively, with an efficiency of 11.41%, compares to 9.60% for the indirect-type solar dryer. Both systems effectively reduce the weight of potato slices but solar tunnel dryer demonstrated superior performance in maintaining uniformity. The study concludes that the solar tunnel dryer is more suitable for large-scale and time sensitive operations, whereas the indirect-type solar dryer is a cost-effective solution for small-scale applications. This work highlights the potential of solar drying technologies as energy-efficient and sustainable methods for food preservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iatmsi64286.2025.10984708
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Tunnel and Indirect-Type Solar Dryers: A Study Using Potato Slices

Gurveer Singh, Prashant Baredar, Gaurav Dwivedi, R. S. Suman et al.
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Performance Evaluation of Tunnel and Indirect-Type Solar Dryers: A Study Using Potato Slices

Gurveer Singh, Prashant Baredar, Gaurav Dwivedi, R. S. Suman, Sakhi Katre
article en

Abstract

This study presents the comparative performance of a solar tunnel dryer and an indirect-type solar dryer for drying potato slices. Experiments are conducted to assess moisture removal efficiency, drying time, and energy efficiency. The initial moisture content of potato slices of 82% wet was reduced to 34.9% for solar tunnel dryer and 45.2% for indirect-type solar dryer. Both systems' drying times and temperature profiles are recorded. Results shows that the solar tunnel dryer achieves faster drying compares to indirect-type solar dryer, due to its higher and consistent temperatures. Energy efficiency calculations reveals that the solar tunnel dryer utilizes available solar energy more effectively, with an efficiency of 11.41%, compares to 9.60% for the indirect-type solar dryer. Both systems effectively reduce the weight of potato slices but solar tunnel dryer demonstrated superior performance in maintaining uniformity. The study concludes that the solar tunnel dryer is more suitable for large-scale and time sensitive operations, whereas the indirect-type solar dryer is a cost-effective solution for small-scale applications. This work highlights the potential of solar drying technologies as energy-efficient and sustainable methods for food preservation.

Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Evaluation of Tunnel and Indirect-Type Solar Dryers: A Study Using Potato Slices — Gurveer Singh, Prashant Baredar, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS