Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN in Fire and Smoke Detection

The increasing prevalence of wildfires poses significant risks to the environment, human life, and property. The heightened intensity and frequency of these fires underscore the need for effective early detection systems to enhance response efforts and reduce potential damage. Early detection is vital for preventing catastrophic events at the moment a fire ignites. This paper explores the utilization of Faster R-CNN and Yolo for the efficient and accurate detection of fire and smoke, leveraging advancements in machine learning and computer vision. Paper presents the Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8(small, medium, and large) variants and Faster R-CNN in fire and smoke detection. Results obtained for fire detection based on Precision, Recall, Accuracy, mAP@50, F1 score is as follows: Yolov8s(0.831, 0.856, 0.7272, 0.892, 0.8420), Yolov8m(0.817, 0.819, 0.6957, 0.864, 0.8205), Yolov8l (0.825, 0.841, 0.7264, 0.88, 0.8415) and Faster R-CNN (0.751, 1, 0.835, 0.740, 0.858). Faster R-CNN demonstrated better accuracy as compared to Yolov8.The performance of Yolo and Faster R-CNN exhibits variability due to differences in architectural design, methodologies employed for object detection, and the inherent trade-offs between speed and accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/esci63694.2025.10988212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN in Fire and Smoke Detection

Sai Madhavi D, Bhekhraj Patwa, Shilpa Pimpalkar
1 citations
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
1.30
article

Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN in Fire and Smoke Detection

Sai Madhavi D, Bhekhraj Patwa, Shilpa Pimpalkar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of wildfires poses significant risks to the environment, human life, and property. The heightened intensity and frequency of these fires underscore the need for effective early detection systems to enhance response efforts and reduce potential damage. Early detection is vital for preventing catastrophic events at the moment a fire ignites. This paper explores the utilization of Faster R-CNN and Yolo for the efficient and accurate detection of fire and smoke, leveraging advancements in machine learning and computer vision. Paper presents the Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8(small, medium, and large) variants and Faster R-CNN in fire and smoke detection. Results obtained for fire detection based on Precision, Recall, Accuracy, mAP@50, F1 score is as follows: Yolov8s(0.831, 0.856, 0.7272, 0.892, 0.8420), Yolov8m(0.817, 0.819, 0.6957, 0.864, 0.8205), Yolov8l (0.825, 0.841, 0.7264, 0.88, 0.8415) and Faster R-CNN (0.751, 1, 0.835, 0.740, 0.858). Faster R-CNN demonstrated better accuracy as compared to Yolov8.The performance of Yolo and Faster R-CNN exhibits variability due to differences in architectural design, methodologies employed for object detection, and the inherent trade-offs between speed and accuracy.

AISSMS Institute of Information Technology, New York University (US), Visvesvaraya Technological University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.