Comparing Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods for HVAC System Optimization with Forecast Parameters Over Various Time Periods

Buildings are significant contributors to global energy consumption. Maintaining comfortable indoor temperatures while reducing energy consumption are conflicting objectives. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a promising area of research for building Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system optimization. In this study an open-source framework Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST), which is a virtual testbed that help comparison different control strategies for evaluation of DRL control methods is used. A Proportional-Integral (PI) controller is used to benchmark the DRL methods. A single zone residential building of 192 m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> with a radial heating system and a heat pump in a climate zone with high heating requirement with dynamic electricity prices with prices varying every 15 min based on demand is chosen for implementing different control strategies. On comparing Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Twin Delay DDPG (TD3) based DRL controllers and the baseline controller, the DDPG based controller reduced energy consumption by 97.3 % and operating cost by 17.7 % during the peak heating period with reference to baseline method. Then on analyzing the impact of inclusion of forecast parameters occupancy, solar irradiance, and electricity prices over the period 3, 6 and 12 hours in DDPG based controller. The prediction for 3 hours gave the greatest reduction in thermal discomfort of 99.7 % and prediction for 12 hours gave maximum reduction in cost by 30.4 % but resulted in only 82% reduction in thermal comfort when compared with baseline method indicating that longer prediction horizon is not necessarily results in better performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iatmsi64286.2025.10984746
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods for HVAC System Optimization with Forecast Parameters Over Various Time Periods

S. Sathya Bama, M. Hema, Prema Arokia Mary G, M. Nageswara Guptha
1 citations
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
article

Comparing Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods for HVAC System Optimization with Forecast Parameters Over Various Time Periods

S. Sathya Bama, M. Hema, Prema Arokia Mary G, M. Nageswara Guptha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Buildings are significant contributors to global energy consumption. Maintaining comfortable indoor temperatures while reducing energy consumption are conflicting objectives. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a promising area of research for building Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system optimization. In this study an open-source framework Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST), which is a virtual testbed that help comparison different control strategies for evaluation of DRL control methods is used. A Proportional-Integral (PI) controller is used to benchmark the DRL methods. A single zone residential building of 192 m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> with a radial heating system and a heat pump in a climate zone with high heating requirement with dynamic electricity prices with prices varying every 15 min based on demand is chosen for implementing different control strategies. On comparing Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Twin Delay DDPG (TD3) based DRL controllers and the baseline controller, the DDPG based controller reduced energy consumption by 97.3 % and operating cost by 17.7 % during the peak heating period with reference to baseline method. Then on analyzing the impact of inclusion of forecast parameters occupancy, solar irradiance, and electricity prices over the period 3, 6 and 12 hours in DDPG based controller. The prediction for 3 hours gave the greatest reduction in thermal discomfort of 99.7 % and prediction for 12 hours gave maximum reduction in cost by 30.4 % but resulted in only 82% reduction in thermal comfort when compared with baseline method indicating that longer prediction horizon is not necessarily results in better performance.

Shri Venkateshwara University (IN), Institute of Technology Management (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.