Geometric Programming for Aerodynamically-Actuated Wingsail Design Optimization

In this article, we describe a deterministic optimization framework for the conceptual-stage design of aerodynamically-actuated wingsails. The primary objective of high-performance sailing is well understood: maximize the conversion of unsteady aerodynamic forces into forward thrust, without inducing excessive overturning moments. However, designing a sail to meet this goal is by no means straightforward due to the existence of multiple recursive, nonlinear design relationships. Consequently, most wingsails are designed in an iterative fashion, using some combination of linear heuristics and engineering intuition. This approach can produce viable designs, but it does so at the expense of time and capital, and provides little physical insight into the underlying design space. By formulating the wingsail design problem as a geometric program, it is possible to quickly generate hundreds of optimal candidate designs, assess their sensitivity to specific constraints and parameters, and determine the shape of Pareto frontiers. Unlike general nonlinear optimization methods, geometric programming optimization is computationally efficient, and requires no initial guesses or hyperparameter tuning. Perhaps most importantly, all the decision variables in a geometric program are determined simultaneously, eliminating the need for iterative piecewise optimization of subsystems. These benefits come at a price: all objective and constraint functions must be described as posynomials. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that this restricted set of functional forms can adequately capture the key physical relationships between wingsail parameters, and provide quantifiable physics-based design guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2025.3536578
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric Programming for Aerodynamically-Actuated Wingsail Design Optimization

Peter Traykovski, Blake Cole
1 citations
IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
4.99
article

Geometric Programming for Aerodynamically-Actuated Wingsail Design Optimization

Peter Traykovski, Blake Cole
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, we describe a deterministic optimization framework for the conceptual-stage design of aerodynamically-actuated wingsails. The primary objective of high-performance sailing is well understood: maximize the conversion of unsteady aerodynamic forces into forward thrust, without inducing excessive overturning moments. However, designing a sail to meet this goal is by no means straightforward due to the existence of multiple recursive, nonlinear design relationships. Consequently, most wingsails are designed in an iterative fashion, using some combination of linear heuristics and engineering intuition. This approach can produce viable designs, but it does so at the expense of time and capital, and provides little physical insight into the underlying design space. By formulating the wingsail design problem as a geometric program, it is possible to quickly generate hundreds of optimal candidate designs, assess their sensitivity to specific constraints and parameters, and determine the shape of Pareto frontiers. Unlike general nonlinear optimization methods, geometric programming optimization is computationally efficient, and requires no initial guesses or hyperparameter tuning. Perhaps most importantly, all the decision variables in a geometric program are determined simultaneously, eliminating the need for iterative piecewise optimization of subsystems. These benefits come at a price: all objective and constraint functions must be described as posynomials. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that this restricted set of functional forms can adequately capture the key physical relationships between wingsail parameters, and provide quantifiable physics-based design guidance.

IEEE Journal of Oceanic EngineeringVol. 50(3)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.