IoT Device Identification Techniques: A Comparative Analysis for Security Practitioners

As the Internet of Things (IoT) continues to grow, networks are increasingly at risk from vulnerable devices that allow access to attackers. Two particular threats are posed by rogue devices (i.e. devices present on a network that should not be) and unpatched devices (devices with out-of-date software or firmware). A growing body of research attempts to address these risks: automated IoT device identification. By using methods to quickly and easily identify IoT devices on a network, vulnerable devices can be identified, improving network security. Although there have been publications that survey this research, they are typically broad, discussing IoT device identification only in passing, and do not provide a methodology to clearly compare existing (or future) research. Our novel approach in this paper is to provide a simple methodology for assessing and comparing research into IoT device identification, bypassing the need to delve into granular details such as specific algorithmic choices or feature selections, which are attributes not all papers have, and instead to focus on common attributes shared across papers. We provide a comprehensive literature review for the topic of identifying IoT devices in networks using passive network traffic, resulting in 69 publications examined. We systematically analyse the literature for key elements common across the studies that can allow a comparative analysis, and define five we determine to be most important. We state why these five elements in particular are important, and discuss trends in these elements across the studies. We then produce a summary table containing just the information for the five elements for each study, and how they can be used to understand and compare techniques, considering their context. This gives security professionals and researchers the necessary tools to compare studies, both current and future, to understand how to secure their networks and what they must consider when completing further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3568673
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IoT Device Identification Techniques: A Comparative Analysis for Security Practitioners

Paul Thomas, Thomas Cattermole, Ashley Andrews, George Oikonomou et al.
2 citations
IEEE Access
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
2.97
article

IoT Device Identification Techniques: A Comparative Analysis for Security Practitioners

Paul Thomas, Thomas Cattermole, Ashley Andrews, George Oikonomou, Simon Armour
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As the Internet of Things (IoT) continues to grow, networks are increasingly at risk from vulnerable devices that allow access to attackers. Two particular threats are posed by rogue devices (i.e. devices present on a network that should not be) and unpatched devices (devices with out-of-date software or firmware). A growing body of research attempts to address these risks: automated IoT device identification. By using methods to quickly and easily identify IoT devices on a network, vulnerable devices can be identified, improving network security. Although there have been publications that survey this research, they are typically broad, discussing IoT device identification only in passing, and do not provide a methodology to clearly compare existing (or future) research. Our novel approach in this paper is to provide a simple methodology for assessing and comparing research into IoT device identification, bypassing the need to delve into granular details such as specific algorithmic choices or feature selections, which are attributes not all papers have, and instead to focus on common attributes shared across papers. We provide a comprehensive literature review for the topic of identifying IoT devices in networks using passive network traffic, resulting in 69 publications examined. We systematically analyse the literature for key elements common across the studies that can allow a comparative analysis, and define five we determine to be most important. We state why these five elements in particular are important, and discuss trends in these elements across the studies. We then produce a summary table containing just the information for the five elements for each study, and how they can be used to understand and compare techniques, considering their context. This gives security professionals and researchers the necessary tools to compare studies, both current and future, to understand how to secure their networks and what they must consider when completing further research.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
University of Bristol (GB), Ulverscroft (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.