Certification of Business Practices and Algorithms as a Complementary Approach to Platform Regulation

Digital platforms have transformed markets and created considerable value, mostly for their owners. As the Big Tech firms have leveraged their platforms to capture dominant market positions, concerns have been raised about their unfair business practices, abuse of market power, exploitation of stakeholders, and harm to society. Policymakers have sought to apply antitrust law and promote regulation to constrain the dominant platforms, yet the effectiveness of this approach has been limited. We discuss the types of harm inflicted on end users, business users, competitors, and society at large, and we analyze the recent regulation of digital platforms in the United States and the European Union, pointing to its limitations. We proceed by introducing the notion of inspection and certification of business practices and algorithms as a complementary approach that relies on market incentives to encourage competition and align the business practices of digital platforms with the interests of stakeholders. We explain the merits of this approach versus regulation, outline a plan for implementing it while coping with expected challenges, and offer practical recommendations for policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0421
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Certification of Business Practices and Algorithms as a Complementary Approach to Platform Regulation

Oreste Pollicino, Tommaso Valletti, Dovev Lavie
Academy of Management Perspectives
Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
article

Certification of Business Practices and Algorithms as a Complementary Approach to Platform Regulation

Oreste Pollicino, Tommaso Valletti, Dovev Lavie
article en

Abstract

Digital platforms have transformed markets and created considerable value, mostly for their owners. As the Big Tech firms have leveraged their platforms to capture dominant market positions, concerns have been raised about their unfair business practices, abuse of market power, exploitation of stakeholders, and harm to society. Policymakers have sought to apply antitrust law and promote regulation to constrain the dominant platforms, yet the effectiveness of this approach has been limited. We discuss the types of harm inflicted on end users, business users, competitors, and society at large, and we analyze the recent regulation of digital platforms in the United States and the European Union, pointing to its limitations. We proceed by introducing the notion of inspection and certification of business practices and algorithms as a complementary approach that relies on market incentives to encourage competition and align the business practices of digital platforms with the interests of stakeholders. We explain the merits of this approach versus regulation, outline a plan for implementing it while coping with expected challenges, and offer practical recommendations for policymakers.

Academy of Management Perspectives
Imperial College London (GB), Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.