Usability testing a web application to support evidence-based commissioning decisions for implementing mobile stroke units

Commissioning of innovations in healthcare is a complex socio-technical process, ideally informed by high quality evidence. However, evidence is not always prepared and presented in a format usable for commissioning decisions. Agile methodology, combined with qualitative co-design, were used to develop a digital web application incorporating machine learning models of stroke outcomes to inform commissioning decisions for the implementation of mobile stroke units (MSUs) in England, followed by usability testing using think aloud methodology. Sixteen stakeholders involved in developing consensus on model parameters and pathways participated with data thematically analysed. Required improvements to the web application were identified and novel insights into the complexity of context-specific commissioning decisions were generated, which also informed participants' views on the viability of MSUs. This study provides empirical evidence in support of developing innovative and accessible digital dissemination methods to engage with commissioning processes and prospectively understand commissioning challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01691-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Usability testing a web application to support evidence-based commissioning decisions for implementing mobile stroke units

Anna S. E. Laws, Christopher Price, Phil White, Peter McMeekin et al.
1 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
article

Usability testing a web application to support evidence-based commissioning decisions for implementing mobile stroke units

Anna S. E. Laws, Christopher Price, Phil White, Peter McMeekin, Daniel Phillips, Stephen McCarthy, Kerry Pearn, Graham McClelland, D.R. Wilson, Lisa Shaw, Gary A. Ford, Jason Scott, Laura J Park, Michael Allen, Martin James, Lisa Moseley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Commissioning of innovations in healthcare is a complex socio-technical process, ideally informed by high quality evidence. However, evidence is not always prepared and presented in a format usable for commissioning decisions. Agile methodology, combined with qualitative co-design, were used to develop a digital web application incorporating machine learning models of stroke outcomes to inform commissioning decisions for the implementation of mobile stroke units (MSUs) in England, followed by usability testing using think aloud methodology. Sixteen stakeholders involved in developing consensus on model parameters and pathways participated with data thematically analysed. Required improvements to the web application were identified and novel insights into the complexity of context-specific commissioning decisions were generated, which also informed participants' views on the viability of MSUs. This study provides empirical evidence in support of developing innovative and accessible digital dissemination methods to engage with commissioning processes and prospectively understand commissioning challenges.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
University of Exeter (GB), Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (GB), Northumbria University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB), Newcastle University (GB), Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.