Comparative Analysis of Mechanized Farming Policies and Agriculture Green Development in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and China: Towards Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in the 21st Century

Sustainable agricultural productivity is an essential part of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Nigeria, China and Saudi Arabia have been striving to achieve sustainable agricultural productivity. However, less attention is given to comparative analysis concerning the utilization of mechanized farming in boosting agricultural productivity. This study therefore aims at exploring policies for adoption of mechanized farming practices in the aforementioned countries. The methodology employed in this study is content analysis of secondary data as integral part of quantitative research. The findings indicated that in the Nigerian context, mechanized harvesting and threshing, have been shown to significantly reduce food losses, increase yields, and positively impact socio-economic aspects. In China, agricultural mechanization plays a crucial role in reducing fertilizer input through increased agricultural mechanization investment, enhancing efficiency, and reducing pollution while in Saudi Arabia, mechanized farming policies have significantly evolved, driven by government initiatives aimed at fostering agricultural productivity and food security focusing on drought-resistant crops, water-efficient farming, and alternative protein. It is further shown that, comparatively, Nigeria China and Saudi Arabia differ in their agricultural policies, programmes, and structures, impacting their mechanization approaches. It is therefore suggested that policymakers should consider the demand-side factors influencing tractor adoption and the potential effects to drive comprehensive mechanization policies in order to boost agricultural productivity and encourage agripreneurs in the two countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1646
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Mechanized Farming Policies and Agriculture Green Development in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and China: Towards Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in the 21st Century

Yusuff Jelili Amuda, Abdulqader Al-Khateeb
Journal of Posthumanism
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Comparative Analysis of Mechanized Farming Policies and Agriculture Green Development in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and China: Towards Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in the 21st Century

Yusuff Jelili Amuda, Abdulqader Al-Khateeb
article en

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural productivity is an essential part of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Nigeria, China and Saudi Arabia have been striving to achieve sustainable agricultural productivity. However, less attention is given to comparative analysis concerning the utilization of mechanized farming in boosting agricultural productivity. This study therefore aims at exploring policies for adoption of mechanized farming practices in the aforementioned countries. The methodology employed in this study is content analysis of secondary data as integral part of quantitative research. The findings indicated that in the Nigerian context, mechanized harvesting and threshing, have been shown to significantly reduce food losses, increase yields, and positively impact socio-economic aspects. In China, agricultural mechanization plays a crucial role in reducing fertilizer input through increased agricultural mechanization investment, enhancing efficiency, and reducing pollution while in Saudi Arabia, mechanized farming policies have significantly evolved, driven by government initiatives aimed at fostering agricultural productivity and food security focusing on drought-resistant crops, water-efficient farming, and alternative protein. It is further shown that, comparatively, Nigeria China and Saudi Arabia differ in their agricultural policies, programmes, and structures, impacting their mechanization approaches. It is therefore suggested that policymakers should consider the demand-side factors influencing tractor adoption and the potential effects to drive comprehensive mechanization policies in order to boost agricultural productivity and encourage agripreneurs in the two countries.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(5)
Prince Sultan University (SA)
Prince Sultan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Mechanized Farming Policies and Agriculture Green Development in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and China: Towards Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in the 21st Century — Yusuff Jelili Amuda, Abdulqader Al-Khateeb · Journal of Posthumanism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS