“Glassy Margents”: Biblical Paratexts, Early Modern Readers, and Shakespeare

Early modern readers engaged with the paratexts of their Bibles. This essay reviews a corpus of eighty-six English vernacular Bibles (printed 1537–1610) in the collection of the Bodleian Library and documents the manuscript marginalia marking the paratexts of these Bibles. These readers’ marks provide fresh material evidence of readers turning to annotations and chapter heads for interpretative guidance and engaging with the Geneva’s running titles, epigraphs, prefaces, and concordances by copying them out, underlining them, and creating their own bespoke versions of these paratexts. This essay—by looking at each main printed paratext in turn (frontispiece, prefaces, running titles, chapter heads, navigational tables, indices, concordances, and marginal annotations)—details how early modern readers shaped their reading experience through annotating the apparatus of their Bibles. Alongside this, it gathers internal evidence from Shakespeare’s writing for his own engagement with the literary thematics of the “margent.” The new archival evidence for the careful contemporary searching of the Geneva’s “glassy margents” clarifies and nuances the possibilities of Shakespeare’s own marginal metaphors. The new evidence for the importance of Genevan paratexts to early modern readers draws attention to the ways the figurative margents of Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, and Lucrece likewise explicate and edify. This exploration of the responses of early modern readers to biblical paratexts provides important context for understanding of Shakespeare’s own marginal poetics. [B.G.]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Literary Renaissance
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734984
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Glassy Margents”: Biblical Paratexts, Early Modern Readers, and Shakespeare

Beatrice Groves
1 citations
English Literary Renaissance
Historical and Linguistic Studies
4.20
article

“Glassy Margents”: Biblical Paratexts, Early Modern Readers, and Shakespeare

Beatrice Groves
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Early modern readers engaged with the paratexts of their Bibles. This essay reviews a corpus of eighty-six English vernacular Bibles (printed 1537–1610) in the collection of the Bodleian Library and documents the manuscript marginalia marking the paratexts of these Bibles. These readers’ marks provide fresh material evidence of readers turning to annotations and chapter heads for interpretative guidance and engaging with the Geneva’s running titles, epigraphs, prefaces, and concordances by copying them out, underlining them, and creating their own bespoke versions of these paratexts. This essay—by looking at each main printed paratext in turn (frontispiece, prefaces, running titles, chapter heads, navigational tables, indices, concordances, and marginal annotations)—details how early modern readers shaped their reading experience through annotating the apparatus of their Bibles. Alongside this, it gathers internal evidence from Shakespeare’s writing for his own engagement with the literary thematics of the “margent.” The new archival evidence for the careful contemporary searching of the Geneva’s “glassy margents” clarifies and nuances the possibilities of Shakespeare’s own marginal metaphors. The new evidence for the importance of Genevan paratexts to early modern readers draws attention to the ways the figurative margents of Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, and Lucrece likewise explicate and edify. This exploration of the responses of early modern readers to biblical paratexts provides important context for understanding of Shakespeare’s own marginal poetics. [B.G.]

English Literary RenaissanceVol. 55(2)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.