Emergy, environmental impact, and economic assessment of rubber–edible mushroom–vegetable intercropping in Hainan, China

Intercropping in rubber plantations has been widely recognized as an effective measure to enhance the economic benefits and mitigate the environmental impact of rubber cultivation systems. The practice of cultivating specialty edible mushrooms under rubber, followed by utilizing spent mushroom substrate to grow vegetables under the same forest canopy, has been widely adopted by rubber farmers in Hainan, China, forming a distinctive rubber–edible mushroom–vegetable intercropping (RMVI) model. However, the economic benefits and environmental impacts of the RMVI cultivation management process remain unclear. This study compared the environmental sustainability and economic benefits of monoculture systems for rubber, edible mushrooms, and vegetables (RMVM) with those of an RMVI system through the combined use of emergy evaluation (EME), life cycle assessment (LCA), and economic analysis (EA). The EME analysis indicated that the total emergy value of the RMVI system was lower than that of the RMVM system. From the perspective of the emergy index, the RMVI system exhibited lower environmental pressure and higher system sustainability than the RMVM system. The LCA suggest that transitioning from monoculture to intercropping can reduce all environmental impact categories by approximately 3.59 %–36.84 %. In terms of climate change specifically, the CO 2 emissions were reduced by 12.94 %. In both the RMVM or RMVI systems, the input of mushroom spawn sticks (MSS) and their transportation were critical factors contributing to environmental consequences, accounting for 4.95 %–55.73 % and 22.13 %–88.97 % of the total environmental impact, respectively. Therefore, optimizing the inputs in the MSS production process and decreasing the MSS transportation distance can reduce the system’s environmental impact. The EA revealed that compared with RMVM, the RMVI system reduced costs by 19.74 % and increased profits and the cost–benefit ratio by 5.93 % and 31.99 %, respectively. These findings indicate that the RMVI system is conducive to enhancing the environmental sustainability and economic viability of rubber cultivation. Policies should promote the widespread adoption and practice of the RMVI system to enhance the sustainable transformation of rubber production systems. • Integrated assessment of the monoculture and intercropping systems were compared. • Intercropping exhibits higher sustainability and lower environmental impact. • Mushroom spawn sticks and transportation have the greatest environmental impacts. • The profit and cost–benefit ratio is increased by the intercropping system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial Crops and Products
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.121172
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergy, environmental impact, and economic assessment of rubber–edible mushroom–vegetable intercropping in Hainan, China

Lianyan Bu, Hanting Cheng, Qinfen Li, Xu Lin et al.
4 citations
Industrial Crops and Products
Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
3.20
article

Emergy, environmental impact, and economic assessment of rubber–edible mushroom–vegetable intercropping in Hainan, China

Lianyan Bu, Hanting Cheng, Qinfen Li, Xu Lin, Xiaohui Zhou, Xiaolan Zheng, Yang Yang, Ye Ding
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Intercropping in rubber plantations has been widely recognized as an effective measure to enhance the economic benefits and mitigate the environmental impact of rubber cultivation systems. The practice of cultivating specialty edible mushrooms under rubber, followed by utilizing spent mushroom substrate to grow vegetables under the same forest canopy, has been widely adopted by rubber farmers in Hainan, China, forming a distinctive rubber–edible mushroom–vegetable intercropping (RMVI) model. However, the economic benefits and environmental impacts of the RMVI cultivation management process remain unclear. This study compared the environmental sustainability and economic benefits of monoculture systems for rubber, edible mushrooms, and vegetables (RMVM) with those of an RMVI system through the combined use of emergy evaluation (EME), life cycle assessment (LCA), and economic analysis (EA). The EME analysis indicated that the total emergy value of the RMVI system was lower than that of the RMVM system. From the perspective of the emergy index, the RMVI system exhibited lower environmental pressure and higher system sustainability than the RMVM system. The LCA suggest that transitioning from monoculture to intercropping can reduce all environmental impact categories by approximately 3.59 %–36.84 %. In terms of climate change specifically, the CO 2 emissions were reduced by 12.94 %. In both the RMVM or RMVI systems, the input of mushroom spawn sticks (MSS) and their transportation were critical factors contributing to environmental consequences, accounting for 4.95 %–55.73 % and 22.13 %–88.97 % of the total environmental impact, respectively. Therefore, optimizing the inputs in the MSS production process and decreasing the MSS transportation distance can reduce the system’s environmental impact. The EA revealed that compared with RMVM, the RMVI system reduced costs by 19.74 % and increased profits and the cost–benefit ratio by 5.93 % and 31.99 %, respectively. These findings indicate that the RMVI system is conducive to enhancing the environmental sustainability and economic viability of rubber cultivation. Policies should promote the widespread adoption and practice of the RMVI system to enhance the sustainable transformation of rubber production systems. • Integrated assessment of the monoculture and intercropping systems were compared. • Intercropping exhibits higher sustainability and lower environmental impact. • Mushroom spawn sticks and transportation have the greatest environmental impacts. • The profit and cost–benefit ratio is increased by the intercropping system.

Industrial Crops and ProductsVol. 231
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.