Five-year follow-up of a single centre uro-oncology tumour board decisions

The quality of the oncologic care is evaluable with meaningful outcome indicators. Five-year overall survival (OS) rate is a good indicator for treatments of curative intent for localised diseases. One-year OS rate and median survival are good indictors for treatments of palliative intent for metastatic diseases. This study assessed 5-year follow-up data of a regional uro-oncological centre. Patients presented at the multidisciplinary uro-oncology tumour board of Petz Aladár Hospital are prospectively followed-up. In 2017 the oncology board made decisions for the treatment of 353 patients. No patient diagnosed with urological malignancy was excluded. Patients were offered validated surgical, radiation or medical treatments of curative or palliative intent consistent with international guidelines or comfort treatment if anticancer therapy was not possible. The 5-year disease specific OS rate of patients treated for localised prostate-, kidney- and muscle invasive bladder cancer was 79%, 81% and 21% respectively. The respective 1-year OS rate of patients treated for metastatic prostate-, kidney- and bladder cancer was 70%, 40% and 33%, median survival was 36, 8 and 8 months. This simple method of surveillance is suitable for the internal quality control of a multidisciplinary tumour board. The data of the first 5-year follow-up indicate well balanced care for urological malignancies at Petz Aladár Hospital. The results correspond to high quality requirements in a country with generally poor oncologic outcome indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Health Systems
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44250-025-00224-8
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five-year follow-up of a single centre uro-oncology tumour board decisions

Noémi Kránitz, Károly Kocsis, Tamás Kullmann, Zsolt Jenő Szepesváry et al.
Discover Health Systems
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Five-year follow-up of a single centre uro-oncology tumour board decisions

Noémi Kránitz, Károly Kocsis, Tamás Kullmann, Zsolt Jenő Szepesváry, Ferenc Törzsök
article en

Abstract

The quality of the oncologic care is evaluable with meaningful outcome indicators. Five-year overall survival (OS) rate is a good indicator for treatments of curative intent for localised diseases. One-year OS rate and median survival are good indictors for treatments of palliative intent for metastatic diseases. This study assessed 5-year follow-up data of a regional uro-oncological centre. Patients presented at the multidisciplinary uro-oncology tumour board of Petz Aladár Hospital are prospectively followed-up. In 2017 the oncology board made decisions for the treatment of 353 patients. No patient diagnosed with urological malignancy was excluded. Patients were offered validated surgical, radiation or medical treatments of curative or palliative intent consistent with international guidelines or comfort treatment if anticancer therapy was not possible. The 5-year disease specific OS rate of patients treated for localised prostate-, kidney- and muscle invasive bladder cancer was 79%, 81% and 21% respectively. The respective 1-year OS rate of patients treated for metastatic prostate-, kidney- and bladder cancer was 70%, 40% and 33%, median survival was 36, 8 and 8 months. This simple method of surveillance is suitable for the internal quality control of a multidisciplinary tumour board. The data of the first 5-year follow-up indicate well balanced care for urological malignancies at Petz Aladár Hospital. The results correspond to high quality requirements in a country with generally poor oncologic outcome indicators.

Discover Health SystemsVol. 4(1)
Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház (HU), Széchenyi István University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.