Comparative evaluation of intraoral stent materials: dosimetric response analysis
<i>Purpose</i>. To evaluate and compare the dosimetric properties of various materials used in intraoral stents, with a particular focus on their interaction with a 6 MV photon beam in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.<i>Materials and Methods</i>. Experimental irradiation and computational simulation methods were employed to analyze the interaction of various materials with a 6 MV photon beam used in an intraoral procedure. A head phantom, cylindrical in shape and divided into 1 cm plates, was used along with circular PMMA plates and polystyrene to simulate an intraoral procedure. Radiochromic film (EBT3) was used to evaluate the dose-response of PMMA and PET-G materials with thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm, irradiated under a 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup>field size at a 100 cm source-to-skin distance (SSD). The PENELOPE code was used to simulate the dosimetric properties of PMMA, PET-G, EVA, PDMS, and PVDF based on their chemical compositions.<i>Results</i>. A maximum divergence of 4.2% was observed between PET-G and PMMA at a thickness of 3 mm during the experimental procedure. Additionally, a maximum difference of 1.2% was noted when comparing the simulated percentage depth dose curves. Discrepancies of up to 10% were found between experimental irradiation and simulations in polystyrene regions, likely due to the sensitivity of the film to incident fluence. When comparing the simulated materials (PMMA, PET-G, EVA, PDMS, and PVDF), the largest divergence observed was 20% at the surface of the phantom and did not exceed 15% at depths under 10 cm, specifically between PVDF and PMMA. For all other materials, the divergence remained below 10% across all regions.<i>Conclusions</i>. The results suggest that all the materials evaluated for intraoral stent fabrication can be effectively analyzed using the simulation code. PET-G, EVA, and PDMS showed dose-response variations of less than 10%, which should be considered when calculating doses in the treatment system planning, as stents made from these materials may increase the dose to nearby organs.
Authors
- Romulo Rocha Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-1940)
- Heitor Ribeiro Birnfeld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4088-6016)
- Gabriela Corati Touguinha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-8338)
- Luzia Fernandes Millão (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-7428)
- O. Paucar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-8876)
- Mirko Salomón Alva-Sánchez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-3629)
- A. Gonzales (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-6515)
- José Fernando Márquez Pachas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4704-8282)
- Leonardo Pessoa da Silva
- Henrique Trombini
- Carmen Sandra Guzmán Calcina
Institutions
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR)
- National University of San Marcos (PE)
- Santa Casa Hospital (BR)
- Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (BR)
- Universidad Ricardo Palma (PE)
- Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE)
- Universidad Continental (PE)
- National University of Engineering (PE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
- Published
- 2025-05-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add6ac
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00