Persistent Periodic Signals from 51 Peg in TESS Lightcurves

Abstract Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite photometry of the archetypal main-sequence exoplanet host star 51 Peg in two 27 days sectors separated by 2 yr contains a 4.55 days periodic signal, distinct from the 4.23 orbit of the planet. The signal is associated with the pixels containing the most flux, and there is no evidence for a companion or suitably bright background object within that aperture. No similar signal appears in nearby stars of comparable brightness nor does the signal appear in uncontaminated background, bias, or readout frames. The signal is too large and at the wrong period to be reflected light from the planet. 4.55 days would represent a synodic period (e.g., a forced oscillation of the star by the planet) if the star rotates in 60 days. Such slow rotation seems unlikely but is not conclusively ruled out by available observations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Notes of the AAS
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/add5e0
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Persistent Periodic Signals from 51 Peg in TESS Lightcurves

Douglas A. Caldwell, Eric Gaidos, S. Dreizler
Research Notes of the AAS
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Persistent Periodic Signals from 51 Peg in TESS Lightcurves

Douglas A. Caldwell, Eric Gaidos, S. Dreizler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite photometry of the archetypal main-sequence exoplanet host star 51 Peg in two 27 days sectors separated by 2 yr contains a 4.55 days periodic signal, distinct from the 4.23 orbit of the planet. The signal is associated with the pixels containing the most flux, and there is no evidence for a companion or suitably bright background object within that aperture. No similar signal appears in nearby stars of comparable brightness nor does the signal appear in uncontaminated background, bias, or readout frames. The signal is too large and at the wrong period to be reflected light from the planet. 4.55 days would represent a synodic period (e.g., a forced oscillation of the star by the planet) if the star rotates in 60 days. Such slow rotation seems unlikely but is not conclusively ruled out by available observations.

Research Notes of the AASVol. 9(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Persistent Periodic Signals from 51 Peg in TESS Lightcurves — Douglas A. Caldwell, Eric Gaidos, et al. · Research Notes of the AAS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS