Comprehensive Fuel and Emissions Measurements Highlight Uncertainties in Smoke Production Using Predictive Modeling Tools

Predictive modeling tools, such as the First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM), are used to generate estimates of the effects from wildland fires, including fuel consumption and smoke emissions. Given the use of such models in planning and forecasting for wildland fires, coupled with the adverse health and climate impacts of smoke, there is a need to understand the sensitivity to model inputs and processes, evaluate smoke production, and identify critical uncertainties. In this work, FOFEM was applied to a series of prescribed burns at the Blodgett Forest Research Station (BFRS), a western mixed coniferous forest in northern California, adapted to a frequent low-severity fire regime. We evaluated the sensitivity of predicted smoke emissions to parametric uncertainty in model inputs, including fuel characteristics (composition, loading, and moisture) and emission factors (EFs), and structural uncertainty in the consumption model. The results of the modeling simulations and comparison with a unique and comprehensive suite of fuel and emissions measurements suggest that in this application of FOFEM, fuel loadings based on land cover maps had the highest uncertainty and resulted in the largest sensitivity in predicted smoke emissions. The use of land-cover-based fuel loading values significantly underpredicted gas and particle emissions from the prescribed burns by up to ∼80% for carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and by up to ∼85% for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Improvement in the predicted smoke emissions could specifically be achieved by more accurate fuel loading data, particularly for duff and coarse wood, the consumption of which generated the majority of gas (∼50–70%) and particle (∼65%) emissions. For individual gaseous nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs), predicted emissions were additionally sensitive to uncertainty in EFs, demonstrating that the accurate prediction of these NMOCs requires accurate representation of fuel consumption as well as representative EFs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00142
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Fuel and Emissions Measurements Highlight Uncertainties in Smoke Production Using Predictive Modeling Tools

Daniel E. Foster, G Zarate de Lara, R.A. York, Nathan M. Kreisberg et al.
2 citations
ACS ES&T Air
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
article

Comprehensive Fuel and Emissions Measurements Highlight Uncertainties in Smoke Production Using Predictive Modeling Tools

Daniel E. Foster, G Zarate de Lara, R.A. York, Nathan M. Kreisberg, John J. Battles, Kelley C. Barsanti, Deep Sengupta, Thomas W. Kirchstetter, Allen H. Goldstein, Afsara Tasnia, James D. A. Butler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Predictive modeling tools, such as the First Order Fire Effects Model (FOFEM), are used to generate estimates of the effects from wildland fires, including fuel consumption and smoke emissions. Given the use of such models in planning and forecasting for wildland fires, coupled with the adverse health and climate impacts of smoke, there is a need to understand the sensitivity to model inputs and processes, evaluate smoke production, and identify critical uncertainties. In this work, FOFEM was applied to a series of prescribed burns at the Blodgett Forest Research Station (BFRS), a western mixed coniferous forest in northern California, adapted to a frequent low-severity fire regime. We evaluated the sensitivity of predicted smoke emissions to parametric uncertainty in model inputs, including fuel characteristics (composition, loading, and moisture) and emission factors (EFs), and structural uncertainty in the consumption model. The results of the modeling simulations and comparison with a unique and comprehensive suite of fuel and emissions measurements suggest that in this application of FOFEM, fuel loadings based on land cover maps had the highest uncertainty and resulted in the largest sensitivity in predicted smoke emissions. The use of land-cover-based fuel loading values significantly underpredicted gas and particle emissions from the prescribed burns by up to ∼80% for carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and by up to ∼85% for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Improvement in the predicted smoke emissions could specifically be achieved by more accurate fuel loading data, particularly for duff and coarse wood, the consumption of which generated the majority of gas (∼50–70%) and particle (∼65%) emissions. For individual gaseous nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs), predicted emissions were additionally sensitive to uncertainty in EFs, demonstrating that the accurate prediction of these NMOCs requires accurate representation of fuel consumption as well as representative EFs.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 2(6)
University of California, Riverside (US), NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Energy Technologies Institute (GB), Center for Environmental Health (US), Aerosol Dynamics (United States) (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.