ZwischenLieder. Zur politischen und poetologischen Funktion der Reyen in Daniel Casper von Lohensteins Sophonisbe, 1669/1680

Abstract This article deals with the structure of the tragedy ‚Sophonisbe‘ by Daniel Casper von Lohenstein. The aim is to show that the Reyen as textual components do not remain unconnected after the scenes, but integrate a further level of meaning into the play and combine the concerns of conveying historical material on the one hand and panegyric praise of the ruler on the other. The seemingly unavoidable dissimulation of the political world on the stage is not intended to lead to tyranny. The fate of the empire is to be determined by moral and integral negotiation, for which one thing is necessary: a rational but not dispassionate ruler, crowned by his subjects. Sophonisbe’s realisation that this goal is unattainable for Carthage and for herself becomes a tragedy; the course of history, which points to Austria and Silesia as part of the empire, becomes an appeal as praise of the ruler.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artes
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30965/27727629-20250004
Primary Topic
Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ZwischenLieder. Zur politischen und poetologischen Funktion der Reyen in Daniel Casper von Lohensteins Sophonisbe, 1669/1680

Gudrun Bamberger
Artes
Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
article

ZwischenLieder. Zur politischen und poetologischen Funktion der Reyen in Daniel Casper von Lohensteins Sophonisbe, 1669/1680

Gudrun Bamberger
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article deals with the structure of the tragedy ‚Sophonisbe‘ by Daniel Casper von Lohenstein. The aim is to show that the Reyen as textual components do not remain unconnected after the scenes, but integrate a further level of meaning into the play and combine the concerns of conveying historical material on the one hand and panegyric praise of the ruler on the other. The seemingly unavoidable dissimulation of the political world on the stage is not intended to lead to tyranny. The fate of the empire is to be determined by moral and integral negotiation, for which one thing is necessary: a rational but not dispassionate ruler, crowned by his subjects. Sophonisbe’s realisation that this goal is unattainable for Carthage and for herself becomes a tragedy; the course of history, which points to Austria and Silesia as part of the empire, becomes an appeal as praise of the ruler.

ArtesVol. 4(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.