Pediatric Gender Affirming Care is Not Evidence-based

Abstract Purpose of Review This paper reviews outcomes for risks and benefits of puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormones for pediatric gender dysphoria or gender-related distress. Recent Findings Studies conducted over the past 15–20 years have generally reported the effects of these interventions on bone health, metabolic outcomes, and mental health outcomes. Summary With respect to mental health outcomes, individual clinical research studies have inconsistently demonstrated benefit. Systematic evidence reviews, which provide high-level, reliable evidence according to evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles, have found the evidence in this field is comprised of studies with significant quality issues; the body of evidence is considered weak/uncertain. Clinical guidelines should be updated to reflect the reality of the limited evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Sexual Health Reports
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-025-00404-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Gender Affirming Care is Not Evidence-based

Chan Kulatunga-Moruzi, Kathleen McDeavitt, J. Cohn
3 citations
Current Sexual Health Reports
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
7.32
article

Pediatric Gender Affirming Care is Not Evidence-based

Chan Kulatunga-Moruzi, Kathleen McDeavitt, J. Cohn
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This paper reviews outcomes for risks and benefits of puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormones for pediatric gender dysphoria or gender-related distress. Recent Findings Studies conducted over the past 15–20 years have generally reported the effects of these interventions on bone health, metabolic outcomes, and mental health outcomes. Summary With respect to mental health outcomes, individual clinical research studies have inconsistently demonstrated benefit. Systematic evidence reviews, which provide high-level, reliable evidence according to evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles, have found the evidence in this field is comprised of studies with significant quality issues; the body of evidence is considered weak/uncertain. Clinical guidelines should be updated to reflect the reality of the limited evidence.

Current Sexual Health ReportsVol. 17(1)
Baylor College of Medicine (US), Film Independent (US), Japan Society (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.