William S. Burroughs and the ancient historians

Abstract Although not typically known for his close engagement with classical texts, William S. Burroughs (1914–97) incorporates writings by ancient historiographers into several of his later publications, Cities of the Red Night (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1981), The Place of Dead Roads (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1983), and Apocalypse (New York: George Mulder Fine Arts, 1988). This article analyses the alterations that Burroughs makes in these works to Herodotus (4.72), Tacitus (Hist. 3.33), and Plutarch (de defectu oraculorum 419b–e). It demonstrates how Burroughs deliberately alters ancient prose writings as part of a larger aim to rearrange his own physical reality — what the author terms ‘a magical theory of history’. On the one hand this alteration of ancient texts emphasizes a particular technique in Burroughs’ later writing practice, where working on a larger scale the cut-up technique becomes looser and more akin to re-writing, thus echoing more conventional prose. On the other hand, Burroughs’ subversion of canonical classical authors adds a further example to recent scholarship that has examined the forgery of classical texts as a form of queer reception practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical Receptions Journal
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/crj/claf004
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

William S. Burroughs and the ancient historians

Tom Sapsford
Classical Receptions Journal
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

William S. Burroughs and the ancient historians

Tom Sapsford
article en

Abstract

Abstract Although not typically known for his close engagement with classical texts, William S. Burroughs (1914–97) incorporates writings by ancient historiographers into several of his later publications, Cities of the Red Night (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1981), The Place of Dead Roads (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1983), and Apocalypse (New York: George Mulder Fine Arts, 1988). This article analyses the alterations that Burroughs makes in these works to Herodotus (4.72), Tacitus (Hist. 3.33), and Plutarch (de defectu oraculorum 419b–e). It demonstrates how Burroughs deliberately alters ancient prose writings as part of a larger aim to rearrange his own physical reality — what the author terms ‘a magical theory of history’. On the one hand this alteration of ancient texts emphasizes a particular technique in Burroughs’ later writing practice, where working on a larger scale the cut-up technique becomes looser and more akin to re-writing, thus echoing more conventional prose. On the other hand, Burroughs’ subversion of canonical classical authors adds a further example to recent scholarship that has examined the forgery of classical texts as a form of queer reception practice.

Classical Receptions JournalVol. 17(3)
Boston College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.