Exploring the impact of dark kitchens on community quality-of-life: The role of local biopolitics, disposition, integrity, and lobbying

This study examines residents’ perceived impact of dark kitchens on community Quality-of-Life. A Community Engagement Theory-based research model is developed, including Gentrification, Local Biopolitics, Disposition and Integrity as antecedents, while perceived Lobbying for/against dark kitchens is used as a moderator. A survey is administered to 1827 US adults via Amazon Mechanical Turk. After controlling for Lobbying, the results indicate that Local Biopolitics, Disposition and Integrity positively related to better perceptions of Quality-of-Life, thus pointing that in large urban areas, dark kitchens may become an important player in meal provision. Furthermore, the findings reveal how trust in dark kitchens and positive Disposition towards them can significantly enhance residents’ perceived community impact, specifically when high levels of Lobbying are perceived too. These findings also suggest that while dark kitchens can enhance community well-being through responsible practices and positive public engagement, the role of Lobbying introduces complexity, potentially undermining trust in these businesses. The study underscores the need for balanced regulation and community involvement to maximize the benefits of dark kitchens in urban settings. • Local biopolitics and dark kitchen integrity boost community quality-of-life. • Lobbying moderates the impact of dark kitchens on urban well-being positively. • Positive dark kitchen diposition enhances community engagement and satisfaction. • Gentrification had no significant effect on community quality-of-life. • Effective lobbying aligns dark kitchen policies with community needs.