Differential tissue deformability underlies fluid pressure-driven shape divergence of the avian embryonic brain and spinal cord
An enlarged brain underlies the complex central nervous system of vertebrates. The dramatic expansion of the brain that diverges its shape from the spinal cord follows neural tube closure during embryonic development. Here, we show that this differential deformation is encoded by a pre-pattern of tissue material properties in chicken embryos. Using magnetic droplets and atomic force microscopy, we demonstrate that the dorsal hindbrain is more fluid than the dorsal spinal cord, resulting in a thinning versus a resisting response to increasing lumen pressure, respectively. The dorsal hindbrain exhibits reduced apical actin and a disorganized laminin matrix consistent with tissue fluidization. Blocking the activity of neural-crest-associated matrix metalloproteinases inhibits hindbrain expansion. Transplanting dorsal hindbrain cells to the spinal cord can locally create an expanded brain-like morphology in some cases. Our findings raise questions in vertebrate head evolution and suggest a general role of mechanical pre-patterning in sculpting epithelial tubes.
Authors
- Kristian Franze (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8425-7297)
- Siyuan Ding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-260X)
- Édouard Hannezo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-1561)
- Susannah B. P. McLaren
- Fengzhu Xiong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-0254)
- Alexander K. Winkel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-7964)
- Shi-Lei Xue (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3483-1852)
- Oscar Baldwin
- Shreya Dwarakacherla
Institutions
- Institute of Science and Technology Austria (AT)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- The Gurdon Institute (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Developmental Cell
- Published
- 2025-05-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2025.04.010
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 24.53