Integrating Machine Learning-Based Pose Sampling with Established Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening

Physics-based docking methods have long been the cornerstone of structure-based virtual screening (VS). However, the emergence of machine learning (ML)-based docking approaches has opened new possibilities for enhancing VS technologies. In this study, we explore the integration of DiffDock-L, a leading ML-based pose sampling method, into VS workflows by combining it with the Vina, Gnina, and RTMScore scoring functions. We assess this integrated approach in terms of its VS effectiveness, pose sampling quality, and complementarity to traditional physics-based docking methods, such as AutoDock Vina. Our findings from the DUDE-Z benchmark dataset show that DiffDock-L performs competitively in both VS performance and pose sampling in cross-docking settings. In most cases, it generates physically plausible and biologically relevant poses, establishing itself as a viable alternative to physics-based docking algorithms. Additionally, we found that the choice of scoring function significantly influences VS success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00380
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Machine Learning-Based Pose Sampling with Established Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening

Hosein Fooladi, Johannes Kirchmair, Thi Ngoc Lan Vu
3 citations
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
3.41
article

Integrating Machine Learning-Based Pose Sampling with Established Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening

Hosein Fooladi, Johannes Kirchmair, Thi Ngoc Lan Vu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Physics-based docking methods have long been the cornerstone of structure-based virtual screening (VS). However, the emergence of machine learning (ML)-based docking approaches has opened new possibilities for enhancing VS technologies. In this study, we explore the integration of DiffDock-L, a leading ML-based pose sampling method, into VS workflows by combining it with the Vina, Gnina, and RTMScore scoring functions. We assess this integrated approach in terms of its VS effectiveness, pose sampling quality, and complementarity to traditional physics-based docking methods, such as AutoDock Vina. Our findings from the DUDE-Z benchmark dataset show that DiffDock-L performs competitively in both VS performance and pose sampling in cross-docking settings. In most cases, it generates physically plausible and biologically relevant poses, establishing itself as a viable alternative to physics-based docking algorithms. Additionally, we found that the choice of scoring function significantly influences VS success.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 65(10)
University of Vienna (AT), Christian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity (AT)
Boehringer Ingelheim, Österreichische Nationalstiftung für Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung, Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Image Processing Techniques and Applications
3.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.