Pressure-Related Discrepancies in Landsat 8 Level 2 Collection 2 Surface Reflectance Products and Their Correction

Landsat 8 Level 2 Collection 2 (L2C2) surface reflectance (SR) products are widely used in various scientific applications by the remote sensing community, where their accuracy is vital for reliable analysis. However, discrepancies have been observed at shorter wavelength bands, which can affect certain applications. This study investigates the root cause of these differences by analyzing the assumptions made in the Land Surface Reflectance Code (LaSRC), the atmospheric correction algorithm of Landsat 8, as currently implemented at United States Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (USGS EROS), and proposes a correction method. To quantify these discrepancies, ground truth SR measurements from the Radiometric Calibration Network (RadCalNet) and Arable Mark 2 sensors were compared with the Landsat 8 SR. Additionally, the surface pressure measurements from RadCalNet and the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) were evaluated against the LaSRC-calculated surface pressure values. The findings reveal that the discrepancies arose from using a single scene center surface pressure for the entire Landsat 8 scene pixels. The pressure-related discrepancies were most pronounced in the coastal aerosol and blue bands, with greater deviations observed in regions where the elevation of the study area differed substantially from the scene center, such as Railroad Valley Playa (RVUS) and Baotao Sand (BSCN). To address this issue, an exponential correction model was developed, reducing the mean error in the coastal aerosol band for RVUS from 0.0226 to 0.0029 (about two units of reflectance), which can be substantial for dark vegetative and water targets. In the blue band, there is a smaller improvement in the mean error, from 0.0095 to −0.0032 (about half a unit of reflectance). For the green band, the reduction in error was much less due to the significantly lesser impact of aerosol on this band. Overall, this study underscores the need for a more precise estimation of surface pressure in LaSRC to enhance the reliability of Landsat 8 SR products in remote sensing applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17101676
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate change and permafrost
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure-Related Discrepancies in Landsat 8 Level 2 Collection 2 Surface Reflectance Products and Their Correction

Larry Leigh, Dinithi Siriwardana Pathiranage, S. K. Adhikari
3 citations
Remote Sensing
Climate change and permafrost
3.90
article

Pressure-Related Discrepancies in Landsat 8 Level 2 Collection 2 Surface Reflectance Products and Their Correction

Larry Leigh, Dinithi Siriwardana Pathiranage, S. K. Adhikari
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Landsat 8 Level 2 Collection 2 (L2C2) surface reflectance (SR) products are widely used in various scientific applications by the remote sensing community, where their accuracy is vital for reliable analysis. However, discrepancies have been observed at shorter wavelength bands, which can affect certain applications. This study investigates the root cause of these differences by analyzing the assumptions made in the Land Surface Reflectance Code (LaSRC), the atmospheric correction algorithm of Landsat 8, as currently implemented at United States Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (USGS EROS), and proposes a correction method. To quantify these discrepancies, ground truth SR measurements from the Radiometric Calibration Network (RadCalNet) and Arable Mark 2 sensors were compared with the Landsat 8 SR. Additionally, the surface pressure measurements from RadCalNet and the National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) were evaluated against the LaSRC-calculated surface pressure values. The findings reveal that the discrepancies arose from using a single scene center surface pressure for the entire Landsat 8 scene pixels. The pressure-related discrepancies were most pronounced in the coastal aerosol and blue bands, with greater deviations observed in regions where the elevation of the study area differed substantially from the scene center, such as Railroad Valley Playa (RVUS) and Baotao Sand (BSCN). To address this issue, an exponential correction model was developed, reducing the mean error in the coastal aerosol band for RVUS from 0.0226 to 0.0029 (about two units of reflectance), which can be substantial for dark vegetative and water targets. In the blue band, there is a smaller improvement in the mean error, from 0.0095 to −0.0032 (about half a unit of reflectance). For the green band, the reduction in error was much less due to the significantly lesser impact of aerosol on this band. Overall, this study underscores the need for a more precise estimation of surface pressure in LaSRC to enhance the reliability of Landsat 8 SR products in remote sensing applications.

Remote SensingVol. 17(10)
South Dakota State University (US)
U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate change and permafrost
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.