Towards an official gene nomenclature for <i>Populus trichocarpa</i>

The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (www.genenames.org), which has been naming human genes for over 40 years, has been tasked with establishing an official gene nomenclature system for the black cottonwood tree Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Here, we review the factors that must be considered when establishing gene nomenclature guidelines. What makes a good gene symbol, and what lessons can be learned from other nomenclature projects? Are there particular challenges associated with naming genes in poplar species? We look at the published gene symbols for Populus and highlight some issues, e.g., the same symbols being used for different genes, and diverse approaches to naming in gene families. What approaches can we take to resolving such conflicts? Since community adoption is key to the success of any nomenclature initiative, we have surveyed poplar researchers for feedback on draft guidelines and discussed some of the issues raised. Finally, we discuss the sustainability of such infrastructure projects-if we build it, will they come and who will fund the ongoing work?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tree Physiology
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf054
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an official gene nomenclature for Populus trichocarpa

Elspeth A. Bruford, Susan Tweedie, Stanton Martin
3 citations
Tree Physiology
Bioenergy crop production and management
5.71
article

Towards an official gene nomenclature for Populus trichocarpa

Elspeth A. Bruford, Susan Tweedie, Stanton Martin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (www.genenames.org), which has been naming human genes for over 40 years, has been tasked with establishing an official gene nomenclature system for the black cottonwood tree Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Here, we review the factors that must be considered when establishing gene nomenclature guidelines. What makes a good gene symbol, and what lessons can be learned from other nomenclature projects? Are there particular challenges associated with naming genes in poplar species? We look at the published gene symbols for Populus and highlight some issues, e.g., the same symbols being used for different genes, and diverse approaches to naming in gene families. What approaches can we take to resolving such conflicts? Since community adoption is key to the success of any nomenclature initiative, we have surveyed poplar researchers for feedback on draft guidelines and discussed some of the issues raised. Finally, we discuss the sustainability of such infrastructure projects-if we build it, will they come and who will fund the ongoing work?

Tree PhysiologyVol. 45(13)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge School (PT)
U.S. Department of Energy, Battelle, UT-Battelle, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research, Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bioenergy crop production and management
5.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards an official gene nomenclature for <i>Populus trichocarpa</i> — Elspeth A. Bruford, Susan Tweedie, et al. · Tree Physiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS