Environmental Benefits Evaluation of a Bike-Sharing System in the Boston Area: A Longitudinal Study

With increasing concerns over climate change and air pollution, sustainable transportation has become a critical component of modern city planning. Bike-sharing systems have emerged as an eco-friendly alternative to motorized transport, contributing to energy conservation and emission reduction. To elaborate on bike-sharing’s contribution to urban sustainable development, this study conducts a quantitative analysis of its environmental benefits through a case study of the Bluebikes program in the Boston area, using a longitudinal dataset of 20.07 million bike trips from January 2015 to December 2024, with data between January 2020 and December 2021 excluded. A combination of Scheiner’s model and Multinomial Logit model was adopted to evaluate the substitution of Bluebikes trips, an optimized Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model was employed to predict future usage, while energy savings were calculated by estimating reductions in gasoline and diesel consumption. The findings reveal that during the analyzed period, Bluebikes trips saved 2616.44 tons of oil equivalent and reduced CO2 and NOX emissions by 7614.96 and 16.43 tons, respectively. Furthermore, based on the historical trends, it is forecasted that the Bluebikes program will annually save an average of 723.66 tons of oil equivalent and decrease CO2 and NOX emissions by 2422.65 and 4.52 tons between 2025 and 2027. The results highlight the substantial environmental impact of Bluebikes and support policies that encourage their usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9050159
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Benefits Evaluation of a Bike-Sharing System in the Boston Area: A Longitudinal Study

L.C. Li, Qiyao Yang, Mengzhen Ding, Jun Cai et al.
2 citations
Urban Science
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
article

Environmental Benefits Evaluation of a Bike-Sharing System in the Boston Area: A Longitudinal Study

L.C. Li, Qiyao Yang, Mengzhen Ding, Jun Cai, Shaohua Zhang, Yishuang Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With increasing concerns over climate change and air pollution, sustainable transportation has become a critical component of modern city planning. Bike-sharing systems have emerged as an eco-friendly alternative to motorized transport, contributing to energy conservation and emission reduction. To elaborate on bike-sharing’s contribution to urban sustainable development, this study conducts a quantitative analysis of its environmental benefits through a case study of the Bluebikes program in the Boston area, using a longitudinal dataset of 20.07 million bike trips from January 2015 to December 2024, with data between January 2020 and December 2021 excluded. A combination of Scheiner’s model and Multinomial Logit model was adopted to evaluate the substitution of Bluebikes trips, an optimized Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model was employed to predict future usage, while energy savings were calculated by estimating reductions in gasoline and diesel consumption. The findings reveal that during the analyzed period, Bluebikes trips saved 2616.44 tons of oil equivalent and reduced CO2 and NOX emissions by 7614.96 and 16.43 tons, respectively. Furthermore, based on the historical trends, it is forecasted that the Bluebikes program will annually save an average of 723.66 tons of oil equivalent and decrease CO2 and NOX emissions by 2422.65 and 4.52 tons between 2025 and 2027. The results highlight the substantial environmental impact of Bluebikes and support policies that encourage their usage.

Urban ScienceVol. 9(5)
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Dalian University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
4.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.