Access to contextually-determined states in the interpretation of English stative participles

Stative passive participles (SPPs) differ in acceptability for different verbs: cf. The boxes are flattened/\#kicked. However, examples like those with kicked can be felicitous in very specific contexts, e.g. when box-kicking is an item to be checked off of a list: what will be called a 'Job is Done' (JiD) interpretation. An unresolved question in the prior literature is whether JiD is eventive or stative. This question takes on added significance in the context of recent work on the interpretation of SPPs. We argue that JiD is indeed stative, and show that this analysis has numerous consequences for understanding the syntax and interpretation of SPPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5926
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to contextually-determined states in the interpretation of English stative participles

David Embick, Alison Biggs
1 citations
Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

Access to contextually-determined states in the interpretation of English stative participles

David Embick, Alison Biggs
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Stative passive participles (SPPs) differ in acceptability for different verbs: cf. The boxes are flattened/\#kicked. However, examples like those with kicked can be felicitous in very specific contexts, e.g. when box-kicking is an item to be checked off of a list: what will be called a 'Job is Done' (JiD) interpretation. An unresolved question in the prior literature is whether JiD is eventive or stative. This question takes on added significance in the context of recent work on the interpretation of SPPs. We argue that JiD is indeed stative, and show that this analysis has numerous consequences for understanding the syntax and interpretation of SPPs.

Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of AmericaVol. 10(1)
California University of Pennsylvania (US), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.