Food consumption motivations override and moderate the effect of nutrition label on responses to (un)healthy products

Front-of-package (FOP) labels, highlighting key nutrition information of food products, have garnered interest as a means to promote healthy eating. However, previous studies have shown limited effects of FOP labels, warranting further investigation. This paper examines how an interpretive summary indicator FOP label influences consumers' cognitive, senso-emotional, and behavioural responses to (un)healthy ready-to-eat meals. Additionally, it explores the role of consumer motivations (health, pleasure, and sustainability) in relation to a FOP label. Two between-subject studies were conducted online (Study 1: N = 516) and in a lab (Study 2: N = 116), along with a real-life experiment in a lunch buffet (Study 3: N = 1166). Studies 1 and 2 revealed that consumer motivations had a greater impact than a FOP label on cognitive (nutrient content and healthiness perceptions, purchase intention) and senso-emotional (taste perceptions and emotions) responses. Motivations also moderated the FOP label's impact: FOP label improved emotions related to the unhealthy product among health-conscious consumers, suggesting a health halo effect. FOP label might also be a sign to consume more among those not motivated by health, pleasure, or sustainability. In Study 3, demonstrating the behavioural impact, FOP label either increased or had no effect on the proportion of healthy food consumed, depending on the product. The results indicate that FOP labels have limited and mixed effects on product responses and may even be counterproductive in promoting healthy diets among some consumers. These findings assist policymakers and food marketers in identifying consumer groups and products that benefit from FOP labels indicating better nutritional quality. • Consumer motivations are more influential than nutrition labels in food experience. • Consumer motivations moderate the effect of nutrition labels. • Health-motivated consumers liked the unhealthy product more with nutrition labels. • Nutrition labels did not benefit consumers low in consumption motivations. • Sustainability appears as a prominent motivational factor in healthy eating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105568
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food consumption motivations override and moderate the effect of nutrition label on responses to (un)healthy products

Maija Kantola, Anu Hopia, Harri Luomala, Terhi Junkkari
2 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
article

Food consumption motivations override and moderate the effect of nutrition label on responses to (un)healthy products

Maija Kantola, Anu Hopia, Harri Luomala, Terhi Junkkari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Front-of-package (FOP) labels, highlighting key nutrition information of food products, have garnered interest as a means to promote healthy eating. However, previous studies have shown limited effects of FOP labels, warranting further investigation. This paper examines how an interpretive summary indicator FOP label influences consumers' cognitive, senso-emotional, and behavioural responses to (un)healthy ready-to-eat meals. Additionally, it explores the role of consumer motivations (health, pleasure, and sustainability) in relation to a FOP label. Two between-subject studies were conducted online (Study 1: N = 516) and in a lab (Study 2: N = 116), along with a real-life experiment in a lunch buffet (Study 3: N = 1166). Studies 1 and 2 revealed that consumer motivations had a greater impact than a FOP label on cognitive (nutrient content and healthiness perceptions, purchase intention) and senso-emotional (taste perceptions and emotions) responses. Motivations also moderated the FOP label's impact: FOP label improved emotions related to the unhealthy product among health-conscious consumers, suggesting a health halo effect. FOP label might also be a sign to consume more among those not motivated by health, pleasure, or sustainability. In Study 3, demonstrating the behavioural impact, FOP label either increased or had no effect on the proportion of healthy food consumed, depending on the product. The results indicate that FOP labels have limited and mixed effects on product responses and may even be counterproductive in promoting healthy diets among some consumers. These findings assist policymakers and food marketers in identifying consumer groups and products that benefit from FOP labels indicating better nutritional quality. • Consumer motivations are more influential than nutrition labels in food experience. • Consumer motivations moderate the effect of nutrition labels. • Health-motivated consumers liked the unhealthy product more with nutrition labels. • Nutrition labels did not benefit consumers low in consumption motivations. • Sustainability appears as a prominent motivational factor in healthy eating.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 131
University of Turku (FI), Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Vaasa (FI)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.