Evaluation of the second-generation Eurocode 8 framework for the analysis of various integral abutment bridge types

This study evaluates the Eurocode 8 provisions for seismic analysis of various typologies of integral abutment bridges (IABs), emphasising configurations representative of Slovenian construction practice. The analysed typologies include monolithic middle piers, stub and full-height abutments, shallow and deep foundations, piles embedded in sloping embankments, symmetric fully-integral bridges and asymmetric semi-integral bridges. It has been found that certain modelling adjustments should be made to address the specific properties of some analysed configurations. Adequate solutions have been proposed, based on the parametric study where the simplified analysis methods, as proposed in the new Eurocode 8, were compared with the dynamic response history analysis. The results were used to calibrate the damping ratios for linear and nonlinear static analyses and the passive pressure distribution for models used in linear static analysis. Subsequently, static analyses were performed, and the results were compared to dynamic responses to assess the accuracy and limitations of the static analyses. Based on these comparisons, final recommendations are provided to improve the applicability of Eurocode 8 to a broader range of IAB typologies. • Insights for applying Eurocode 8 models to various IAB configurations were provided. • Static models were evaluated against dynamic model trough a parametric study. • Adjustments to damping ratio and passive pressure distribution were proposed. • Modelling of the abutment piles embedded in sloping ground was addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120501
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the second-generation Eurocode 8 framework for the analysis of various integral abutment bridge types

Anže Babič, Andrea De Marchi, Tatjana Isaković, Marko Tomić
1 citations
Engineering Structures
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.30
article

Evaluation of the second-generation Eurocode 8 framework for the analysis of various integral abutment bridge types

Anže Babič, Andrea De Marchi, Tatjana Isaković, Marko Tomić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the Eurocode 8 provisions for seismic analysis of various typologies of integral abutment bridges (IABs), emphasising configurations representative of Slovenian construction practice. The analysed typologies include monolithic middle piers, stub and full-height abutments, shallow and deep foundations, piles embedded in sloping embankments, symmetric fully-integral bridges and asymmetric semi-integral bridges. It has been found that certain modelling adjustments should be made to address the specific properties of some analysed configurations. Adequate solutions have been proposed, based on the parametric study where the simplified analysis methods, as proposed in the new Eurocode 8, were compared with the dynamic response history analysis. The results were used to calibrate the damping ratios for linear and nonlinear static analyses and the passive pressure distribution for models used in linear static analysis. Subsequently, static analyses were performed, and the results were compared to dynamic responses to assess the accuracy and limitations of the static analyses. Based on these comparisons, final recommendations are provided to improve the applicability of Eurocode 8 to a broader range of IAB typologies. • Insights for applying Eurocode 8 models to various IAB configurations were provided. • Static models were evaluated against dynamic model trough a parametric study. • Adjustments to damping ratio and passive pressure distribution were proposed. • Modelling of the abutment piles embedded in sloping ground was addressed.

Engineering StructuresVol. 337
University of Ljubljana (SI), Geodetic Institute of Slovenia (SI), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.