MEASURING COMPLAINT ATTITUDE IN COLLEGE STUDENTS: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

A complaint attitude is defined as an evaluative disposition, comprising cognitive, affective, and behavioral components, that individuals express dissatisfaction in response to perceived injustices. Despite the relevance of complaints in academic settings, there is a lack of brief, validated instruments for assessing students’ attitudes toward complaining. This study aimed to develop and validate the Complaint Attitude Scale (CAS) based on the tripartite model of attitude. An initial pool of 11 items was developed from theoretical constructs and refined through expert judgment by seven specialists who rated each item’s relevance, coherence, and clarity on a 4-point scale. The Aiken’s V values ranged from .95 to 1.00, confirming strong content validity. Two independent samples were used: sample 1 (n = 110) for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and sample 2 (n = 328) for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA identified four items with poor performance, and the CFA confirmed a unidimensional model with acceptable fit indices (CFI = .99, TLI = .99, RMSEA = .07, SRMR = .02). The final 6-item model demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .89; ω = .85) and high factor loading ( .60). Graded Response Model analysis indicated high item discrimination (a = 1.35–2.87) and a balanced range of difficulty parameters (b = –1.15 to 1.76). These findings support the CAS as a psychometrically robust and theoretically grounded instrument for assessing college students’ attitudes toward lawsuits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Thought
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v18i1.1066
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MEASURING COMPLAINT ATTITUDE IN COLLEGE STUDENTS: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

Daniel E. Yupanqui-Lorenzo, Doris Alvines-Fernandez, Gustavo Villar-Mayuntupa, Judyth G Morales-Martínez et al.
Psychological Thought
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

MEASURING COMPLAINT ATTITUDE IN COLLEGE STUDENTS: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION

Daniel E. Yupanqui-Lorenzo, Doris Alvines-Fernandez, Gustavo Villar-Mayuntupa, Judyth G Morales-Martínez, Alfredo José Pipa Carhuapoma
article en

Abstract

A complaint attitude is defined as an evaluative disposition, comprising cognitive, affective, and behavioral components, that individuals express dissatisfaction in response to perceived injustices. Despite the relevance of complaints in academic settings, there is a lack of brief, validated instruments for assessing students’ attitudes toward complaining. This study aimed to develop and validate the Complaint Attitude Scale (CAS) based on the tripartite model of attitude. An initial pool of 11 items was developed from theoretical constructs and refined through expert judgment by seven specialists who rated each item’s relevance, coherence, and clarity on a 4-point scale. The Aiken’s V values ranged from .95 to 1.00, confirming strong content validity. Two independent samples were used: sample 1 (n = 110) for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and sample 2 (n = 328) for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA identified four items with poor performance, and the CFA confirmed a unidimensional model with acceptable fit indices (CFI = .99, TLI = .99, RMSEA = .07, SRMR = .02). The final 6-item model demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = .89; ω = .85) and high factor loading ( .60). Graded Response Model analysis indicated high item discrimination (a = 1.35–2.87) and a balanced range of difficulty parameters (b = –1.15 to 1.76). These findings support the CAS as a psychometrically robust and theoretically grounded instrument for assessing college students’ attitudes toward lawsuits.

Psychological ThoughtVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.