Digital crisis management: how proactive online engagements on patient complaints influence social media users’ perceptions

This study investigates how a pharmaceutical company’s responses to patients’ complaints regarding side effects affect social media users’ evaluation of a paracrisis situation. An online study was conducted by simulating a real-world paracrisis situation in which patients petitioned about the serious side effects of a drug on the pharmaceutical company’s Facebook page. Results showed that users who are actively engaged with social media reacted more positively when the pharmaceutical company proactively responded to a paracrisis situation. In particular, user engagement moderated the effects of company engagement on perceived crisis likelihood. In turn, perceived crisis likelihood mediated the interaction effects on users’ intention to spread negative eWOM and purchase intentions. Thus, this study highlights the importance of proactive engagement by demonstrating the mitigating effects of precrisis engagement when an organization faces a potential crisis situation on social media. It adds theoretical implications to crisis communication literature and provides practical implications as to how online negative events might be managed to minimize negative consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1564650
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital crisis management: how proactive online engagements on patient complaints influence social media users’ perceptions

Samar Ben Romdhane, Sang Yeal Lee
1 citations
Frontiers in Communication
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
3.86
article

Digital crisis management: how proactive online engagements on patient complaints influence social media users’ perceptions

Samar Ben Romdhane, Sang Yeal Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how a pharmaceutical company’s responses to patients’ complaints regarding side effects affect social media users’ evaluation of a paracrisis situation. An online study was conducted by simulating a real-world paracrisis situation in which patients petitioned about the serious side effects of a drug on the pharmaceutical company’s Facebook page. Results showed that users who are actively engaged with social media reacted more positively when the pharmaceutical company proactively responded to a paracrisis situation. In particular, user engagement moderated the effects of company engagement on perceived crisis likelihood. In turn, perceived crisis likelihood mediated the interaction effects on users’ intention to spread negative eWOM and purchase intentions. Thus, this study highlights the importance of proactive engagement by demonstrating the mitigating effects of precrisis engagement when an organization faces a potential crisis situation on social media. It adds theoretical implications to crisis communication literature and provides practical implications as to how online negative events might be managed to minimize negative consequences.

Frontiers in CommunicationVol. 10
Ajman University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.