Transition Engineering co-design sprint: oil company business model

International oil companies (IOCs) face competing pressures to reduce production to meet climate targets while delivering expected shareholder value. These competing pressures create a dissonance surrounding the future business strategy of IOCs. The Systems Transition Engineering approach brings experts together to work through an Interdisciplinary Transition Invention, Management and Engineering (InTIME) Design Sprint, to generate novel concepts for business options that relieve competing pressures in complex and unsustainable systems. This article details a case study of an InTIME Design Sprint conducted with oil industry experts involving a series of investigative workshops. The aim of the sprint is to generate foresight for IOC business pivot opportunities that resolve the dissonance surrounding IOC futures in a climate-safe world. A pivot opportunity represents a profitable business strategy within the bounds of what is feasible and socially acceptable. A theoretical oil company was used to test out hypothetical business scenarios throughout the steps of the sprint. The design sprint was successful in moving the oil industry experts beyond the dissonance and facilitating the foresight of viable and climate-safe business pivot opportunities for an IOC. This result represents a breakthrough that was previously considered unthinkable by the sprint participants. This work contributes a novel use case of the InTIME Design Sprint to an upstream energy system and introduces novel applications of tools to navigate cognitive dissonance and complexity within InTIME Design Sprints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainability
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1560119
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transition Engineering co-design sprint: oil company business model

Susan Krumdieck, Jack Boulton
2 citations
Frontiers in Sustainability
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.73
article

Transition Engineering co-design sprint: oil company business model

Susan Krumdieck, Jack Boulton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

International oil companies (IOCs) face competing pressures to reduce production to meet climate targets while delivering expected shareholder value. These competing pressures create a dissonance surrounding the future business strategy of IOCs. The Systems Transition Engineering approach brings experts together to work through an Interdisciplinary Transition Invention, Management and Engineering (InTIME) Design Sprint, to generate novel concepts for business options that relieve competing pressures in complex and unsustainable systems. This article details a case study of an InTIME Design Sprint conducted with oil industry experts involving a series of investigative workshops. The aim of the sprint is to generate foresight for IOC business pivot opportunities that resolve the dissonance surrounding IOC futures in a climate-safe world. A pivot opportunity represents a profitable business strategy within the bounds of what is feasible and socially acceptable. A theoretical oil company was used to test out hypothetical business scenarios throughout the steps of the sprint. The design sprint was successful in moving the oil industry experts beyond the dissonance and facilitating the foresight of viable and climate-safe business pivot opportunities for an IOC. This result represents a breakthrough that was previously considered unthinkable by the sprint participants. This work contributes a novel use case of the InTIME Design Sprint to an upstream energy system and introduces novel applications of tools to navigate cognitive dissonance and complexity within InTIME Design Sprints.

Frontiers in SustainabilityVol. 6
Heriot-Watt University (GB), Heriot-Watt University Malaysia (MY)
Heriot-Watt University
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transition Engineering co-design sprint: oil company business model — Susan Krumdieck, Jack Boulton · Frontiers in Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS