The development of policies on generative artificial intelligence in UK universities

Generative AI has seen rapid development and adoption in educational settings, presenting both benefits and challenges for universities. This paper examines the response of UK universities, particularly the Russell Group of research-led universities, in developing policies and guidance on the use of generative AI. The analysis covers the implementation of the Russell Group's principles across member institutions, addressing areas such as academic integrity, assessment practices, student use, and guidance for staff. It also explores the varying levels of policy development at non-Russell Group universities, finding that some institutions may struggle to find resources for this issue. The paper situates these institutional responses within theoretical frameworks, highlighting how generative AI has disrupted established practices in higher education. It concludes by emphasizing the need for ongoing collaboration, policy development, and responsiveness to student perspectives as universities navigate this technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251333796
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The development of policies on generative artificial intelligence in UK universities

T. D. Wilson
12 citations
IFLA Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
7.85
article

The development of policies on generative artificial intelligence in UK universities

T. D. Wilson
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Generative AI has seen rapid development and adoption in educational settings, presenting both benefits and challenges for universities. This paper examines the response of UK universities, particularly the Russell Group of research-led universities, in developing policies and guidance on the use of generative AI. The analysis covers the implementation of the Russell Group's principles across member institutions, addressing areas such as academic integrity, assessment practices, student use, and guidance for staff. It also explores the varying levels of policy development at non-Russell Group universities, finding that some institutions may struggle to find resources for this issue. The paper situates these institutional responses within theoretical frameworks, highlighting how generative AI has disrupted established practices in higher education. It concludes by emphasizing the need for ongoing collaboration, policy development, and responsiveness to student perspectives as universities navigate this technology.

IFLA JournalVol. 51(3)
University of Borås (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
7.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.