<i>Room to breathe</i> : Testing the efficacy of mindful breathing and mindful design in enhancing museum experiences

Mindfulness-based activities are increasingly offered in arts institutions, yet little is known about the effectiveness of different interventions. Across two experiments, we examined the impacts of mindful breathing and mindful design on mood and aesthetic experience at Manchester Art Gallery. In Experiment 1, 202 participants viewed two portraits in Room to Breathe, a gallery space designed for mindful art viewing, after watching either a mindful breathing video, an informational video, or no video. Mindful breathing had no significant effect on mood or aesthetic experience. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 in a traditional, non-mindful gallery space, allowing for a direct comparison of mindful breathing and mindful design (N = 261). While mindful breathing again had no impact, mindful design led to increased valence, decreased arousal, higher perceptual engagement, and more time spent viewing. These findings suggest that mindful design, as in Room to Breathe, may enhance aesthetic engagement and well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2025.2502489
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Room to breathe : Testing the efficacy of mindful breathing and mindful design in enhancing museum experiences

Aleksandra Igdalova, Stacey Humphries, Rebecca Chamberlain
2 citations
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
4.61
article

Room to breathe : Testing the efficacy of mindful breathing and mindful design in enhancing museum experiences

Aleksandra Igdalova, Stacey Humphries, Rebecca Chamberlain
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mindfulness-based activities are increasingly offered in arts institutions, yet little is known about the effectiveness of different interventions. Across two experiments, we examined the impacts of mindful breathing and mindful design on mood and aesthetic experience at Manchester Art Gallery. In Experiment 1, 202 participants viewed two portraits in Room to Breathe, a gallery space designed for mindful art viewing, after watching either a mindful breathing video, an informational video, or no video. Mindful breathing had no significant effect on mood or aesthetic experience. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 in a traditional, non-mindful gallery space, allowing for a direct comparison of mindful breathing and mindful design (N = 261). While mindful breathing again had no impact, mindful design led to increased valence, decreased arousal, higher perceptual engagement, and more time spent viewing. These findings suggest that mindful design, as in Room to Breathe, may enhance aesthetic engagement and well-being.

The Journal of Positive PsychologyVol. 20(6)
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

<i>Room to breathe</i> : Testing the efficacy of mindful breathing and mindful design in enhancing museum experiences — Aleksandra Igdalova, Stacey Humphries, et al. · The Journal of Positive Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS