Performing energy: the International Energy Agency and the conflicting imaginaries of capitalist energy transition

Amidst conflict over the indecisive and unrealised energy transition, global energy projections have taken on newfound significance. Yet there remains limited scholarship assessing how these projections relate to the political economy of capitalist energy development. This paper argues that the International Energy Agency (IEA) performs the future of energy, both assessing and influencing energy markets. The IEA's dual role—as both a modeller and active shaper of future energy pathways—has led to significant disputes. This paper examines three periods of projective conflict involving the IEA. By reviewing these disputes, the paper highlights how struggles over the performance of energy reflect the competitive, uneven and unplanned character of capitalist energy transitions, particularly during periods of structural uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Political Economy
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2025.2497763
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performing energy: the International Energy Agency and the conflicting imaginaries of capitalist energy transition

Gabe Eckhouse
2 citations
New Political Economy
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.73
article

Performing energy: the International Energy Agency and the conflicting imaginaries of capitalist energy transition

Gabe Eckhouse
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Amidst conflict over the indecisive and unrealised energy transition, global energy projections have taken on newfound significance. Yet there remains limited scholarship assessing how these projections relate to the political economy of capitalist energy development. This paper argues that the International Energy Agency (IEA) performs the future of energy, both assessing and influencing energy markets. The IEA's dual role—as both a modeller and active shaper of future energy pathways—has led to significant disputes. This paper examines three periods of projective conflict involving the IEA. By reviewing these disputes, the paper highlights how struggles over the performance of energy reflect the competitive, uneven and unplanned character of capitalist energy transitions, particularly during periods of structural uncertainty.

New Political EconomyVol. 30(5)
Uppsala University (SE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.