Host specificity of gastrointestinal parasites in free-ranging sloths from Costa Rica

The diversity and host specificity of gastrointestinal parasites infecting free-ranging sloths is poorly known. We compared gastrointestinal parasites of two sloth species from Costa Rica-three-fingered sloths (<i>Bradypus variegatus</i>) and two-fingered sloths (<i>Choloepus hoffmanni</i>)-for the first time in both a primary forest and an urban habitat. We asked whether host-parasite interactions were predominantly structured by host identity, the habitats in which hosts occurred, or both. Coproparasitology revealed protozoa and nematode eggs from both host species, but cestode eggs were recorded only in <i>C. hoffmanni</i>. We found eight parasitic morphotypes in 38 samples, which matches the total number of these parasites described in sloths over the past 100 years. We found no significant difference in overall parasite richness between sloth species or habitats, but the parasite richness of <i>C. hoffmanni</i> was 2-fold greater in the primary forest <i>vs</i>. urban habitat. As no parasite sharing was observed between sloth species, we found strong and significant differences in parasite composition between host species regardless of habitat. In <i>B. variegatus</i>, we observed eggs of four nematode taxa (Spirocercidae, Subuluroidea, Spirurida, Ascaridida) and cysts of Eimeriidae (Apicomplexa). By contrast, in <i>C. hoffmanni</i>, we observed cestodes (Anoplocephalidae), a different nematode from the family Spirocercidae, and also different cysts of Eimeriidae (Apicomplexa). Many rare taxa were recorded only in samples from the primary forest, and these did not match any sloth parasites that had been previously described in the literature, suggesting that at least some could be undescribed species. Together, these results highlight the paucity of comparative parasitology involving tropical wildlife, the importance of characterizing host-parasite transmission networks, and the potential relevance of intermediate hosts that may be relevant to sloth health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19408
Primary Topic
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Host specificity of gastrointestinal parasites in free-ranging sloths from Costa Rica

Juliana Notarnicola, José Ignacio Navarro Guzmán, Tyler R. Kartzinel, Ezequiel Vanderhoeven et al.
PeerJ
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
article

Host specificity of gastrointestinal parasites in free-ranging sloths from Costa Rica

Juliana Notarnicola, José Ignacio Navarro Guzmán, Tyler R. Kartzinel, Ezequiel Vanderhoeven, Rebecca N. Cliffe, Madeleine Florida
article en

Abstract

The diversity and host specificity of gastrointestinal parasites infecting free-ranging sloths is poorly known. We compared gastrointestinal parasites of two sloth species from Costa Rica-three-fingered sloths (<i>Bradypus variegatus</i>) and two-fingered sloths (<i>Choloepus hoffmanni</i>)-for the first time in both a primary forest and an urban habitat. We asked whether host-parasite interactions were predominantly structured by host identity, the habitats in which hosts occurred, or both. Coproparasitology revealed protozoa and nematode eggs from both host species, but cestode eggs were recorded only in <i>C. hoffmanni</i>. We found eight parasitic morphotypes in 38 samples, which matches the total number of these parasites described in sloths over the past 100 years. We found no significant difference in overall parasite richness between sloth species or habitats, but the parasite richness of <i>C. hoffmanni</i> was 2-fold greater in the primary forest <i>vs</i>. urban habitat. As no parasite sharing was observed between sloth species, we found strong and significant differences in parasite composition between host species regardless of habitat. In <i>B. variegatus</i>, we observed eggs of four nematode taxa (Spirocercidae, Subuluroidea, Spirurida, Ascaridida) and cysts of Eimeriidae (Apicomplexa). By contrast, in <i>C. hoffmanni</i>, we observed cestodes (Anoplocephalidae), a different nematode from the family Spirocercidae, and also different cysts of Eimeriidae (Apicomplexa). Many rare taxa were recorded only in samples from the primary forest, and these did not match any sloth parasites that had been previously described in the literature, suggesting that at least some could be undescribed species. Together, these results highlight the paucity of comparative parasitology involving tropical wildlife, the importance of characterizing host-parasite transmission networks, and the potential relevance of intermediate hosts that may be relevant to sloth health.

PeerJVol. 13
National University of Misiones (AR), Brown University (US), Instituto de Biología Subtropical (AR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.