Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited

ABSTRACT This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter‐Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG‐SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non‐Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG‐SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author‐created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70025
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited

Roni Kay M. O’Dell
Global Policy
Human Rights and Development
article

Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited

Roni Kay M. O’Dell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter‐Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG‐SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non‐Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG‐SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author‐created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.

Global PolicyVol. 16(4)
Seton Hill University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.