Empirical Model for Construction Disputes Using a Bespoke Model

This research addresses the inherent challenges of disputes in construction projects, emphasizing their costly nature in terms of time, money, and resources. Focused on the Singapore construction industry, the study identifies major causes of disputes and proposes an empirical model for construction disputes using a bespoke approach. The objective is to equip project leaders with insights to manage potential disputes in Singapore construction projects. This study utilizes a legal research methodology and analyses secondary data from relevant law cases spanning from 2014 to 2023. A comprehensive analysis of 64 legal cases identified 24 primary causes of disputes, with payment disputes, project delay, variations, liquidated damages, defects and defect rectification costs, quality of work, termination, and retention sums emerging as major contributors due to their higher frequency. In response to these findings, a framework is proposed for incorporating alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to resolve construction disputes in Singapore.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1188
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Model for Construction Disputes Using a Bespoke Model

Amila N. K. K. Gamage, Suresh Kumar
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Empirical Model for Construction Disputes Using a Bespoke Model

Amila N. K. K. Gamage, Suresh Kumar
article en

Abstract

This research addresses the inherent challenges of disputes in construction projects, emphasizing their costly nature in terms of time, money, and resources. Focused on the Singapore construction industry, the study identifies major causes of disputes and proposes an empirical model for construction disputes using a bespoke approach. The objective is to equip project leaders with insights to manage potential disputes in Singapore construction projects. This study utilizes a legal research methodology and analyses secondary data from relevant law cases spanning from 2014 to 2023. A comprehensive analysis of 64 legal cases identified 24 primary causes of disputes, with payment disputes, project delay, variations, liquidated damages, defects and defect rectification costs, quality of work, termination, and retention sums emerging as major contributors due to their higher frequency. In response to these findings, a framework is proposed for incorporating alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to resolve construction disputes in Singapore.

Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and ConstructionVol. 17(3)
University of Liège (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Empirical Model for Construction Disputes Using a Bespoke Model — Amila N. K. K. Gamage, Suresh Kumar · Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS