Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Proses Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Lubuklinggau

This journal discusses the Legal Review of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Prosecution Process of Embezzlement Cases at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office. The main problem is How is the legal review of the implementation of restorative justice in the process of prosecuting embezzlement cases at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office. What are the obstacles of the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office to the implementation of restorative justice in the process of prosecuting embezzlement cases. How are the considerations of the victim so that they choose to resolve the case with the restorative justice mechanism in the process of prosecuting embezzlement cases. This type of research is normative-empirical. Normative-empirical (applied) legal research is research that examines the implementation or implementation of positive legal provisions (legislation) and written documents in action (factual) in every particular legal event that occurs in society. The minimum approach that must be present in normative-empirical legal research is a conceptual approach, a statutory approach, because there is no research that does not start from the concepts and applicable statutory regulations, then supplemented with one or more approaches in empirical legal research. Data collection techniques include; collection of secondary data (literature and written documents) through library studies and document studies and collection of primary data (data on the object of research conducted) through interviews with respondents and informants and sources, questionnaires or lists of questions and observations of the research location to be conducted. This study concludes that the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office has implemented restorative justice in the prosecution process of the embezzlement case with the defendant Sulaiman at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office carried out in full in accordance with the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 and the Circular Letter of JAM-Pidum (Junior Attorney General for General Crimes) Number: 01/E/EJP/02/2022 concerning the Implementation of Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. During its implementation, not all criminal cases can be resolved with restorative justice at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office. There are conditions that must be met by the victim as explained in the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020. The fulfillment of obligations shows that the implementation of the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 creates justice for the parties, namely victims, suspects, families and the community. In addition, a peace agreement through termination of prosecution based on restorative justice is considered successful if the suspect has fulfilled his obligations to the victim or other matters have been fulfilled in accordance with the peace agreement that has been made in writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i5.277
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Proses Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Lubuklinggau

Muji Andoko, Wawan Fransisco, Fitriyani
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Proses Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Lubuklinggau

Muji Andoko, Wawan Fransisco, Fitriyani
article en

Abstract

This journal discusses the Legal Review of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in the Prosecution Process of Embezzlement Cases at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office. The main problem is How is the legal review of the implementation of restorative justice in the process of prosecuting embezzlement cases at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office. What are the obstacles of the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office to the implementation of restorative justice in the process of prosecuting embezzlement cases. How are the considerations of the victim so that they choose to resolve the case with the restorative justice mechanism in the process of prosecuting embezzlement cases. This type of research is normative-empirical. Normative-empirical (applied) legal research is research that examines the implementation or implementation of positive legal provisions (legislation) and written documents in action (factual) in every particular legal event that occurs in society. The minimum approach that must be present in normative-empirical legal research is a conceptual approach, a statutory approach, because there is no research that does not start from the concepts and applicable statutory regulations, then supplemented with one or more approaches in empirical legal research. Data collection techniques include; collection of secondary data (literature and written documents) through library studies and document studies and collection of primary data (data on the object of research conducted) through interviews with respondents and informants and sources, questionnaires or lists of questions and observations of the research location to be conducted. This study concludes that the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office has implemented restorative justice in the prosecution process of the embezzlement case with the defendant Sulaiman at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office carried out in full in accordance with the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 and the Circular Letter of JAM-Pidum (Junior Attorney General for General Crimes) Number: 01/E/EJP/02/2022 concerning the Implementation of Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. During its implementation, not all criminal cases can be resolved with restorative justice at the Lubuklinggau City District Attorney's Office. There are conditions that must be met by the victim as explained in the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020. The fulfillment of obligations shows that the implementation of the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 creates justice for the parties, namely victims, suspects, families and the community. In addition, a peace agreement through termination of prosecution based on restorative justice is considered successful if the suspect has fulfilled his obligations to the victim or other matters have been fulfilled in accordance with the peace agreement that has been made in writing.

Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin EdukasiVol. 2(5)
Universitas Musi Rawas (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.