Mineralogy from µXRF elemental maps: comparison of supervised and unsupervised methods

This study evaluates the effectiveness of four methods for estimating mineralogy from micro X-ray fluorescence (µXRF) elemental maps: two optimized/supervised methods (linear programming and Random Forests) and two unsupervised methods (k-means clustering and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) combined with Hierarchical Density Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN)). µXRF is a non-destructive, high-resolution imaging technique that provides spatially resolved elemental data and bridges the scale gap between micro- and macroscales in mineralogical studies. Analysing samples from porphyry copper deposits (representing a range of textures and mineralogical complexities), each method was assessed based on its ability to accurately represent the mineralogy and texture of each sample relative to a petrographic image. Compared to traditional petrographic assessment, Random Forests yielded the lowest normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) values (0.09–0.38), while k-means (0.06–0.44), linear programming (0.07–0.44) and UMAP–HDBSCAN (0.18–0.64) showed more variable and generally higher error values across the samples. k-Means and linear programming produced results within minutes, Random Forests in ∼10 minutes and UMAP–HDBSCAN in ∼20 minutes. The results demonstrate that supervised methods, particularly Random Forests, deliver better mineralogical estimates, especially in complex mineral assemblages. However, unsupervised methods (particularly k-means) offer a faster initial assessment, making them valuable for preliminary analysis. Combining different methods using known mineral compositions or training datasets could enhance cluster-to-mineral correlation. The integration of supervised, optimization and unsupervised approaches for mineralogy from µXRF data can enhance the robustness and efficiency of mineralogical interpretations, adding significant value across mineral exploration and processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/geochem2024-050
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mineralogy from µXRF elemental maps: comparison of supervised and unsupervised methods

Farhad Bouzari, Shaun L.L. Barker, Cassady Harraden, Andrew P. Steiner
Geochemistry Exploration Environment Analysis
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Mineralogy from µXRF elemental maps: comparison of supervised and unsupervised methods

Farhad Bouzari, Shaun L.L. Barker, Cassady Harraden, Andrew P. Steiner
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of four methods for estimating mineralogy from micro X-ray fluorescence (µXRF) elemental maps: two optimized/supervised methods (linear programming and Random Forests) and two unsupervised methods (k-means clustering and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) combined with Hierarchical Density Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN)). µXRF is a non-destructive, high-resolution imaging technique that provides spatially resolved elemental data and bridges the scale gap between micro- and macroscales in mineralogical studies. Analysing samples from porphyry copper deposits (representing a range of textures and mineralogical complexities), each method was assessed based on its ability to accurately represent the mineralogy and texture of each sample relative to a petrographic image. Compared to traditional petrographic assessment, Random Forests yielded the lowest normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) values (0.09–0.38), while k-means (0.06–0.44), linear programming (0.07–0.44) and UMAP–HDBSCAN (0.18–0.64) showed more variable and generally higher error values across the samples. k-Means and linear programming produced results within minutes, Random Forests in ∼10 minutes and UMAP–HDBSCAN in ∼20 minutes. The results demonstrate that supervised methods, particularly Random Forests, deliver better mineralogical estimates, especially in complex mineral assemblages. However, unsupervised methods (particularly k-means) offer a faster initial assessment, making them valuable for preliminary analysis. Combining different methods using known mineral compositions or training datasets could enhance cluster-to-mineral correlation. The integration of supervised, optimization and unsupervised approaches for mineralogy from µXRF data can enhance the robustness and efficiency of mineralogical interpretations, adding significant value across mineral exploration and processing.

Geochemistry Exploration Environment AnalysisVol. 25(2)
Barrick Gold (Canada) (CA), University of British Columbia (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.