The Complete Message Is the Best Message: The Case for Standardizing Wireless Emergency Alerts

Standardized messaging for alerts and warnings has been made possible through the use of the Warning Lexicon and workflow. The effectiveness of this approach to motivate protective action behaviors, in comparison with the current standard of practice, has not yet been tested. Using an experimental design to test the effectiveness of the Warning Lexicon, we tested three message types for five hazards: blackouts, law enforcement incidents, infectious diseases, heavy snow, and chemical releases, and found that messages created using the Warning Lexicon contents and workflow produced better messaging outcomes than the current standard of practice. Specifically, participants who received the standardized Warning Lexicon message had higher levels of understanding, belief, and self-efficacy than those who received an incomplete or complete standard of practice message. The implications of this research are clear: alerting authorities should write complete messages following a standardized format to maximize positive outcomes for message receivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2293
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Complete Message Is the Best Message: The Case for Standardizing Wireless Emergency Alerts

Hugh Walpole, Michele K. Olson, Michele M. Wood, Nicholas Waugh et al.
6 citations
Natural Hazards Review
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
6.38
article

The Complete Message Is the Best Message: The Case for Standardizing Wireless Emergency Alerts

Hugh Walpole, Michele K. Olson, Michele M. Wood, Nicholas Waugh, Lauren B. Cain, Jeannette Sutton
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Standardized messaging for alerts and warnings has been made possible through the use of the Warning Lexicon and workflow. The effectiveness of this approach to motivate protective action behaviors, in comparison with the current standard of practice, has not yet been tested. Using an experimental design to test the effectiveness of the Warning Lexicon, we tested three message types for five hazards: blackouts, law enforcement incidents, infectious diseases, heavy snow, and chemical releases, and found that messages created using the Warning Lexicon contents and workflow produced better messaging outcomes than the current standard of practice. Specifically, participants who received the standardized Warning Lexicon message had higher levels of understanding, belief, and self-efficacy than those who received an incomplete or complete standard of practice message. The implications of this research are clear: alerting authorities should write complete messages following a standardized format to maximize positive outcomes for message receivers.

Natural Hazards ReviewVol. 26(3)
Albany State University (US), California State University, Fullerton (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
6.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Complete Message Is the Best Message: The Case for Standardizing Wireless Emergency Alerts — Hugh Walpole, Michele K. Olson, et al. · Natural Hazards Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS