Crisis-driven governance reforms: An analytical framework of institutional capacity, leadership, and collaboration in global governance

This research explores how public management analytical perspectives—institutional capacity, crisis leadership and cross-sector collaboration–influence the effectiveness of global governance systems in responding to transnational crises. Through comparative analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2008 financial crisis and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, the research develops an integrated, comprehensive framework (ICC) to explore the dynamic interplay of these dimensions. The findings suggest that institutional capacity forms the structural foundation for crisis response but is constrained by inadequate resources and implementation gaps. Crisis leadership is critical for rapid decision-making and stakeholder coordination but is contingent on institutional frameworks and political responsiveness. Cross-sector collaboration can enhance resilience but faces challenges of fragmented governance structures and conflicting interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Public Administration Review
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251335231
Citations
4
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis-driven governance reforms: An analytical framework of institutional capacity, leadership, and collaboration in global governance

Huadong Zheng
4 citations
Chinese Public Administration Review
International Development and Aid
13.80
article

Crisis-driven governance reforms: An analytical framework of institutional capacity, leadership, and collaboration in global governance

Huadong Zheng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This research explores how public management analytical perspectives—institutional capacity, crisis leadership and cross-sector collaboration–influence the effectiveness of global governance systems in responding to transnational crises. Through comparative analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2008 financial crisis and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, the research develops an integrated, comprehensive framework (ICC) to explore the dynamic interplay of these dimensions. The findings suggest that institutional capacity forms the structural foundation for crisis response but is constrained by inadequate resources and implementation gaps. Crisis leadership is critical for rapid decision-making and stakeholder coordination but is contingent on institutional frameworks and political responsiveness. Cross-sector collaboration can enhance resilience but faces challenges of fragmented governance structures and conflicting interests.

Chinese Public Administration ReviewVol. 17(1)
Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
International Development and Aid
13.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crisis-driven governance reforms: An analytical framework of institutional capacity, leadership, and collaboration in global governance — Huadong Zheng · Chinese Public Administration Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS