Implementing a prediction driven framework for emergency department nurse staffing to optimize real time decisions
Abstract This study implemented and evaluated a prediction-driven nurse staffing framework in a large adult emergency department. The framework leveraged a two-stage prediction model that forecasted patient volume and guided staffing decisions. Using a pre-post study design, we compared patient throughput (measured by door-to-evaluation time, active treatment time, boarding time, length of stay, and left-without-being-seen rate) and cost outcomes (measured as hourly nurse staffing costs) before and after implementation. The model achieved an RMSE of 11.261 and MAPE of 13.414% at the base stage, and an RMSE of 9.973 and MAPE of 12.126% at the surge stage. The framework reduced hourly staffing costs by $162.04 without negatively affecting throughput. Reducing one nurse per hour from the recommended level increased wait times by two minutes, with an additional 2.3-min increase when staffing dropped below 20% of recommendations. These findings highlight the potential of prediction-driven staffing to reduce costs while maintaining patient throughput.
Authors
- Gregory Sugalski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7947-7295)
- Chayapol Ophaswongse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9170-0883)
- Joseph P. Underwood (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-7104)
- Carri W. Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-7334)
- Rimma Perotte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7686-189X)
- Yue Hu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8685-5322)
- Jing Dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-1774)
- Alice Kazekjian
Institutions
- Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Hackensack Meridian Health (US)
- Risk Engineering (Bulgaria) (BG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Health Systems
- Published
- 2025-05-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s44401-025-00019-2
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.25
Funders
- National Science Foundation