Evaluation of genetic diversity and elucidation of population structure of Lathyrus accessions using agro-morphological characters and ISSR technique

Genetic diversity and population structure were evaluated for 36 Lathyrus L. accessions using agronomic characters and ISSR markers. The agronomic characters and ISSR markers showed a wide genetic diversity between Lathyrus accessions. The significant association between 1000 seed weight and total seed protein percentage in Lathyrus accessions revealed that both characters were under independent genetic control. The total number of alleles generated by the markers was 336, revealing 100% polymorphism. The polymorphic information content (PIC), effective multiplex ratio (EMR), marker index (MI), and resolving power (RP) of the markers were 0.75, 16.46, 17.83, and 2.70, respectively, confirming the great variation in Lathyrus accessions. The AMOVA test indicated that 93% of all genetic variation was found within accessions and 7% between accessions. The Ewens-Watterson test for neutrality indicated that the nine markers were neutral, and most of the genetic diversity resided in accessions, with the exception of Lathyrus aphaca from Bulgaria, confirming AMOVA results. The genetic diversity (h) and Shannon's information index were 0.34 and 0.52, respectively, revealing that maker OPA01-812 was highly recommended for distinguishing Lathyrus accessions. The genetic differentiation among accessions (G<sub>ST</sub>) was 0.03, whereas the number of migrants per generation based on Wright's equation (N<sub>mw</sub>) was 18.12. However, the probability (P) of the chi-square values exceeded 0.05 for the nine markers, indicating the low heterogeneity between the investigated accessions. Cluster and correspondence analyses for ISSR results showed that the genetic diversity among Lathyrus accessions was not influenced by their geographical origin. They also revealed that Lathyrus sativus and Lathyrus cicera were not derived from the same ancestor. In conclusion, we recommended (1) Lathyrus sativus PI 179299 for breeding for new cultivars with a high yield and low β-ODAP percentage and (2) ISSR markers for characterizing and differentiating between Lathyrus accessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100500
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of genetic diversity and elucidation of population structure of Lathyrus accessions using agro-morphological characters and ISSR technique

R. H. Sammour, Ahmed Ali Mustafa, Mohamed Ragab AbdelGawwad, Fatin K. I. Alshamasi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
3.50
article

Evaluation of genetic diversity and elucidation of population structure of Lathyrus accessions using agro-morphological characters and ISSR technique

R. H. Sammour, Ahmed Ali Mustafa, Mohamed Ragab AbdelGawwad, Fatin K. I. Alshamasi, Hanan Fahad A.L. Harbi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Genetic diversity and population structure were evaluated for 36 Lathyrus L. accessions using agronomic characters and ISSR markers. The agronomic characters and ISSR markers showed a wide genetic diversity between Lathyrus accessions. The significant association between 1000 seed weight and total seed protein percentage in Lathyrus accessions revealed that both characters were under independent genetic control. The total number of alleles generated by the markers was 336, revealing 100% polymorphism. The polymorphic information content (PIC), effective multiplex ratio (EMR), marker index (MI), and resolving power (RP) of the markers were 0.75, 16.46, 17.83, and 2.70, respectively, confirming the great variation in Lathyrus accessions. The AMOVA test indicated that 93% of all genetic variation was found within accessions and 7% between accessions. The Ewens-Watterson test for neutrality indicated that the nine markers were neutral, and most of the genetic diversity resided in accessions, with the exception of Lathyrus aphaca from Bulgaria, confirming AMOVA results. The genetic diversity (h) and Shannon's information index were 0.34 and 0.52, respectively, revealing that maker OPA01-812 was highly recommended for distinguishing Lathyrus accessions. The genetic differentiation among accessions (G<sub>ST</sub>) was 0.03, whereas the number of migrants per generation based on Wright's equation (N<sub>mw</sub>) was 18.12. However, the probability (P) of the chi-square values exceeded 0.05 for the nine markers, indicating the low heterogeneity between the investigated accessions. Cluster and correspondence analyses for ISSR results showed that the genetic diversity among Lathyrus accessions was not influenced by their geographical origin. They also revealed that Lathyrus sativus and Lathyrus cicera were not derived from the same ancestor. In conclusion, we recommended (1) Lathyrus sativus PI 179299 for breeding for new cultivars with a high yield and low β-ODAP percentage and (2) ISSR markers for characterizing and differentiating between Lathyrus accessions.

Journal of Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyVol. 23(2)
International University of Sarajevo (BA), Tanta University (EG), King Saud University (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.